BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27860138)

  • 1. A novel sample size formula for the weighted log-rank test under the proportional hazards cure model.
    Xiong X; Wu J
    Pharm Stat; 2017 Jan; 16(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 27860138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighted log-rank test for time-to-event data in immunotherapy trials with random delayed treatment effect and cure rate.
    Liu S; Chu C; Rong A
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):541-554. PubMed ID: 30058101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size calculation for testing differences between cure rates with the optimal log-rank test.
    Wu J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(1):124-134. PubMed ID: 26882262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size calculation for the proportional hazards cure model.
    Wang S; Zhang J; Lu W
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3959-71. PubMed ID: 22786805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A sample size formula for the supremum log-rank statistic.
    Eng KH; Kosorok MR
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 15737081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cancer immunotherapy trial design with cure rate and delayed treatment effect.
    Wei J; Wu J
    Stat Med; 2020 Mar; 39(6):698-708. PubMed ID: 31773770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancer immunotherapy trial design with long-term survivors.
    Ding X; Wu J
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Jan; 20(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 32869945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A unified approach to power and sample size determination for log-rank tests under proportional and nonproportional hazards.
    Tang Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1211-1234. PubMed ID: 33819109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study design of single-arm phase II immunotherapy trials with long-term survivors and random delayed treatment effect.
    Chu C; Liu S; Rong A
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Jul; 19(4):358-369. PubMed ID: 31930622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Designing clinical trials with (restricted) mean survival time endpoint: Practical considerations.
    Eaton A; Therneau T; Le-Rademacher J
    Clin Trials; 2020 Jun; 17(3):285-294. PubMed ID: 32063031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cancer immunotherapy trial design with delayed treatment effect.
    Wu J; Wei J
    Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):202-213. PubMed ID: 31729149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On sample size calculation for comparing survival curves under general hypothesis testing.
    Jung SH; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 22416836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculation for mixture model based on geometric average hazard ratio and its applications to nonproportional hazard.
    Wang Z; Zhang Q; Xue A; Whitmore J
    Pharm Stat; 2024; 23(3):325-338. PubMed ID: 38152873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cancer immunotherapy trial design with random delayed treatment effect and cure rate.
    Wu J; Wei J
    Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(4):786-797. PubMed ID: 34779534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical power comparison of statistical tests in contemporary phase III randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes in oncology.
    Horiguchi M; Hassett MJ; Uno H
    Clin Trials; 2020 Dec; 17(6):597-606. PubMed ID: 32933339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are non-constant rates and non-proportional treatment effects accounted for in the design and analysis of randomised controlled trials? A review of current practice.
    Jachno K; Heritier S; Wolfe R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31096924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design considerations in clinical trials with cure rate survival data: A case study in oncology.
    Sun S; Liu G; Lyu T; Xue F; Yeh TM; Rao S
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Mar; 17(2):94-104. PubMed ID: 29159922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size re-estimation for survival data in clinical trials with an adaptive design.
    Togo K; Iwasaki M
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 22328325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-Arm Phase II Survival Trial Design Under the Proportional Hazards Model.
    Wu J
    Stat Biopharm Res; 2017; 9(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 28966721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interim monitoring using the adaptively weighted log-rank test in clinical trials for survival outcomes.
    Yang S
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(4):601-612. PubMed ID: 30209818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.