These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27861192)

  • 41. [Study on the latency difference between compound muscle and sensory nerve action potentials].
    Hasegawa O; Gondo G; Wada N; Matsumoto S; Mimura E
    No To Shinkei; 2001 Jun; 53(6):541-5. PubMed ID: 11436338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Test-retest reliability of the ulnar F-wave minimum latency versus ulnar distal motor latency in healthy adults.
    McNulty VB; McBride KD; Moreland TA; Allison SC; Moore JH; Ernst GP
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 41(6):323-8. PubMed ID: 11680855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. F-response multiplicity in lower motor neuron disorders.
    Pradhan S
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996; 36(7):441-8. PubMed ID: 8957171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Study of nerve conduction and late responses in normal Chinese infants, children, and adults.
    Cai F; Zhang J
    J Child Neurol; 1997 Jan; 12(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9010790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A study of dynamic F-waves in juvenile spinal muscular atrophy of the distal upper extremity (Hirayama disease).
    Zheng C; Zhu Y; Yang S; Lu F; Jin X; Weber R; Jiang J
    J Neurol Sci; 2016 Aug; 367():298-304. PubMed ID: 27423607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of stimulus parameters on characteristics of the F-response in normal subjects.
    Clinchot DM; Colachis SC; Kaplansky BD; Mysiw WJ
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1994; 73(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 7917160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Maximum motor conduction and conduction of a single motor axons in the ulnar and posterior tibial nerves of the normal adult male].
    Fra L; Brignolio F; Delsedime M
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1968 Sep; 44(17):1397-400. PubMed ID: 5719776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. F tacheodispersion estimated from single? Motor units in the F responses (a reply).
    Chroni E; Panayiotopoulos CP
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Sep; 18(9):1075-8. PubMed ID: 7643869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. High frequency discharge of a fraction (f) of motor unit action potential.
    Soichot P; Roth G
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Jun; 101(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 8647031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. F wave parameters and F tacheodispersion in mild diabetic neuropathy.
    Tüzün E; Oge AE; Ertaş M; Boyacíyan A; Dinççağ N; Yazící J
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2001; 41(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 11572188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cauda Equina Conduction Time Determined by F-Waves in Normal Subjects and Patients With Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Caused by Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Imajo Y; Kanchiku T; Suzuki H; Funaba M; Nishida N; Fujimoto K; Taguchi T
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 34(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 27753733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. F wave change by decreased motoneuronal excitability: a sleep study.
    Ichikawa T; Yokota T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1994 Mar; 41(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8137452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Analysis of segmental motor conduction in the median and the ulnar nerves: comparison between normal and diabetic individuals].
    Wada N; Hasegawa O; Kirigaya N; Mimura E; Iino M
    No To Shinkei; 2000 Jan; 52(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 10689687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Do F-wave measurements detect changes in motor neuron excitability?
    Lin JZ; Floeter MK
    Muscle Nerve; 2004 Sep; 30(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 15318339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of cutaneous stimulation on ipsilateral and contralateral motoneuron excitability: an analysis using H reflexes and F waves.
    Walk D; Fisher MA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 33(5):259-64. PubMed ID: 8404560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Motor nerve conduction velocities calculated by F tacheodispersion in patients with anterior horn diseases.
    Chroni E; Howard RS; Spencer GT; Panayiotopoulos CP
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Jun; 36(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 8803491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [F-waves].
    Wang FC; Massart N; Kaux JF; Bouquiaux O
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2011 Dec; 167(12):938-44. PubMed ID: 22100326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. F waves and motor unit size.
    Dengler R; Kossev A; Wohlfahrt K; Schubert M; Elek J; Wolf W
    Muscle Nerve; 1992 Oct; 15(10):1138-42. PubMed ID: 1406771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Linear regression to determine the relationship between F-wave latency and limb length in control dogs.
    Steiss JE
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Dec; 45(12):2649-50. PubMed ID: 6524757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. F-wave conduction velocity, persistence, and amplitude for the tibial nerve in clinically normal cats.
    Okuno S; Kobayashi T; Orito K
    Am J Vet Res; 2008 Feb; 69(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 18241024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.