263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27861230)
1. Structured Reporting of Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Primary Rectal Cancer: Potential Benefits for Surgical Planning and Interdisciplinary Communication.
Nörenberg D; Sommer WH; Thasler W; DʼHaese J; Rentsch M; Kolben T; Schreyer A; Rist C; Reiser M; Armbruster M
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):232-239. PubMed ID: 27861230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structured reporting of prostate magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to improve interdisciplinary communication.
Wetterauer C; Winkel DJ; Federer-Gsponer JR; Halla A; Subotic S; Deckart A; Seifert HH; Boll DT; Ebbing J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212444. PubMed ID: 30779810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structured reports of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in primary endometrial cancer: Potential benefits for clinical decision-making.
Liu Y; Feng Z; Qin S; Yang J; Han C; Wang X
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213928. PubMed ID: 30908525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder - improvement of report quality?
Gassenmaier S; Armbruster M; Haasters F; Helfen T; Henzler T; Alibek S; Pförringer D; Sommer WH; Sommer NN
Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4110-4119. PubMed ID: 28289942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning.
Brook OR; Brook A; Vollmer CM; Kent TS; Sanchez N; Pedrosa I
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):464-72. PubMed ID: 25286323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structured versus narrative reporting of pelvic MRI in perianal fistulizing disease: impact on clarity, completeness, and surgical planning.
Tuncyurek O; Garces-Descovich A; Jaramillo-Cardoso A; Durán EE; Cataldo TE; Poylin VY; Gómez SF; Cabrera AM; Hegazi T; Beker K; Mortele KJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):811-820. PubMed ID: 30519819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structured reporting of CT or MRI for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: usefulness for clinical planning and interdisciplinary communication.
Hong SB; Lee NK; Kim S; Son IW; Seo HI; Kim DU; Han SY; Kim TU
Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 39(4):349-356. PubMed ID: 33175312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structured reporting adds clinical value in primary CT staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Schoeppe F; Sommer WH; Nörenberg D; Verbeek M; Bogner C; Westphalen CB; Dreyling M; Rummeny EJ; Fingerle AA
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3702-3709. PubMed ID: 29600475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiologist and multidisciplinary team clinician opinions on the quality of MRI rectal cancer staging reports: how are we doing?
Brown PJ; Rossington H; Taylor J; Lambregts DMJ; Morris EJA; West NP; Quirke P; Tolan D;
Clin Radiol; 2019 Aug; 74(8):637-642. PubMed ID: 31084973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of a Structured Report Template on the Quality of MRI Reports for Rectal Cancer Staging.
Sahni VA; Silveira PC; Sainani NI; Khorasani R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):584-8. PubMed ID: 26295645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structured reporting in petrous bone MRI examinations: impact on report completeness and quality.
Armbruster M; Gassenmaier S; Haack M; Reiter M; Nörenberg D; Henzler T; Sommer NN; Sommer WH; Braun F
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Dec; 13(12):1971-1980. PubMed ID: 30039247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rectal cancer staging using MRI: adherence in reporting to evidence-based practice.
Alvfeldt G; Aspelin P; Blomqvist L; Sellberg N
Acta Radiol; 2020 Nov; 61(11):1463-1472. PubMed ID: 32106682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do MRI Structured Reports for Multiple Sclerosis Contain Adequate Information for Clinical Decision Making?
Alessandrino F; Pichiecchio A; Mallucci G; Ghione E; Romani A; Bergamaschi R; Bastianello S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 28952814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.
Lambregts DM; Beets GL; Maas M; Kessels AG; Bakers FC; Cappendijk VC; Engelen SM; Lahaye MJ; de Bruïne AP; Lammering G; Leiner T; Verwoerd JL; Wildberger JE; Beets-Tan RG
Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 21239980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI in rectal cancer: An institutional real life analysis of technical parameters.
Mayaud A; Grange R; Leroy B; Phelip JM; Sotton S; Boutet C; Magné N
Bull Cancer; 2023 Dec; 110(12):1244-1250. PubMed ID: 37858424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardised reports with a template format are superior to free text reports: the case for rectal cancer reporting in clinical practice.
Brown PJ; Rossington H; Taylor J; Lambregts DMJ; Morris E; West NP; Quirke P; Tolan D;
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):5121-5128. PubMed ID: 30796574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structured vs narrative reporting of pelvic MRI for fibroids: clarity and impact on treatment planning.
Franconeri A; Fang J; Carney B; Justaniah A; Miller L; Hur HC; King LP; Alammari R; Faintuch S; Mortele KJ; Brook OR
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):3009-3017. PubMed ID: 29247353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A structured approach to reporting rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
Tarulli E; Thipphavong S; Jhaveri K
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3002-11. PubMed ID: 26239398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pitfalls in MRI of rectal cancer: What radiologists need to know and avoid.
Srisajjakul S; Prapaisilp P; Bangchokdee S
Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():130-140. PubMed ID: 29414101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rectal cancer: comparison of accuracy of local-regional staging with two- and three-dimensional preoperative 3-T MR imaging.
Kim H; Lim JS; Choi JY; Park J; Chung YE; Kim MJ; Choi E; Kim NK; Kim KW
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 20093520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
