BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27861251)

  • 1. Fast Click Rate Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response in Normal-Hearing Adults Using Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution.
    Kaf WA; Lewis KM; Yavuz E; Dixon SM; Van Ess M; Jamos AM; Delgado RE
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):244-254. PubMed ID: 27861251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Test, Electrode, and Rate on Electrocochleography Measures.
    Lake AB; Stuart A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 30461400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing Simultaneous Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements Using Three Different Extratympanic Electrodes.
    Lefler SM; Kaf WA; Ferraro JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Jun; 32(6):339-346. PubMed ID: 34082461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.
    Stamper GC; Johnson TA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 25350405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of adaptation on electrocochleography and auditory brain-stem responses in the elderly.
    Soucek S; Mason SM
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 1439500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Superiority of tympanic ball electrodes over mastoid needle electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of hearing function.
    Krieg SM; Kempf L; Droese D; Rosahl SK; Meyer B; Lehmberg J
    J Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120(5):1042-7. PubMed ID: 24559226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear Microphonic and Summating Potential Responses from Click-Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses in High-Risk and Normal Infants.
    Hunter LL; Blankenship CM; Gunter RG; Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Brown DK; Baroch K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 May; 29(5):427-442. PubMed ID: 29708492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined intra-operative monitoring of hearing by means of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and transtympanic electrocochleography (ECochG) during surgery of intra- and extrameatal acoustic neurinomas.
    Schlake HP; Milewski C; Goldbrunner RH; Kindgen A; Riemann R; Helms J; Roosen K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2001 Oct; 143(10):985-95; discussion 995-6. PubMed ID: 11685605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Tympanic electrocochleography with disposable electrode].
    Matsuura K; Tono T; Hara Y; Ueki Y; Ushisako Y; Morimitsu T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1996 Jul; 99(7):1016-25. PubMed ID: 8776976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
    McMahon CM; Patuzzi RB; Gibson WP; Sanli H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural and receptor cochlear potentials obtained by transtympanic electrocochleography in auditory neuropathy.
    Santarelli R; Starr A; Michalewski HJ; Arslan E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 119(5):1028-41. PubMed ID: 18358774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mutation of OPA1 gene causes deafness by affecting function of auditory nerve terminals.
    Huang T; Santarelli R; Starr A
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1300():97-104. PubMed ID: 19733158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoperative neuromonitoring for superior semicircular canal dehiscence and hearing outcomes.
    Wenzel A; Ward BK; Ritzl EK; Gutierrez-Hernandez S; Della Santina CC; Minor LB; Carey JP
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 25333320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response.
    Konrad-Martin D; Dille MF; McMillan G; Griest S; McDermott D; Fausti SA; Austin DF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):18-35; quiz 74-5. PubMed ID: 22284838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrocochleography in endolymphatic hydrops using tone-pip and click stimuli.
    Koyuncu M; Mason SM; Saunders MW
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1994 Feb; 19(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 8174307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compound action potential and cochlear microphonic extracted from electrocochleographic responses to condensation or rarefaction clicks.
    Arslan E; Santarelli R; Sparacino G; Sella G
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11603770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
    Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Battmer RD; Dhooge IJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of high stimulus rate on the electrocochleogram in normal-hearing subjects.
    Wilson WJ; Bowker CA
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Dec; 41(8):509-17. PubMed ID: 12477171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.