181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27861666)
1. Internal- vs External-Connection Single Implants: A Retrospective Study in an Italian Population Treated by Certified Prosthodontists.
Vigolo P; Gracis S; Carboncini F; Mutinelli S;
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1385-1396. PubMed ID: 27861666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.
Gracis S; Michalakis K; Vigolo P; Vult von Steyern P; Zwahlen M; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():202-16. PubMed ID: 23062143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up.
Mangano F; Macchi A; Caprioglio A; Sammons RL; Piattelli A; Mangano C
J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 24750435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P; Morgano SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Pieri F; Aldini NN; Marchetti C; Corinaldesi G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):169-78. PubMed ID: 21365053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective clinical evaluation of 307 single-tooth morse taper-connection implants: a multicenter study.
Mangano C; Mangano F; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; Mangano A; La Colla L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):394-400. PubMed ID: 20369101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical report on the 18-month cumulative survival rates of implants and implant prostheses with an internal connection implant system.
Drago CJ; O'Connor CG
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2006 Apr; 27(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 16646396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-year analysis of zirconia implants used for single-tooth replacement and three-unit fixed dental prostheses: A prospective multicenter study.
Balmer M; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):290-299. PubMed ID: 29330869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical complications of implant-supported restorations with internal conical connection implants: A 14-year retrospective study.
Yi Y; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):732-740. PubMed ID: 34481672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of the incidence of prosthetic complications in implant crowns constructed with UCLA castable abutments. A cohort follow-up study.
Montero J; Manzano G; Beltrán D; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ; Castillo-Oyagüe R
J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1081-9. PubMed ID: 22982530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Evaluation of the Influence of Connection Type and Restoration Height on the Reliability of Zirconia Abutments: A Retrospective Study on 965 Abutments with a Mean 6-Year Follow-Up.
Fabbri G; Fradeani M; Dellificorelli G; De Lorenzi M; Zarone F; Sorrentino R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2017; 37(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 27977814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cumulative survival rate and complication rates of single-tooth implant; focused on the coronal fracture of fixture in the internal connection implant.
Cha HS; Kim YS; Jeon JH; Lee JH
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 40(8):595-602. PubMed ID: 23679929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Split-Mouth Comparison of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses on Short Implants: 3-Year Results.
Clelland N; Chaudhry J; Rashid RG; McGlumphy E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 27632270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single tooth replacement by Morse taper connection implants: a retrospective study of 80 implants.
Mangano C; Bartolucci EG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 11669250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture Resistance of Straight and Angulated Zirconia Implant Abutments Supporting Anterior Three-Unit Lithium Disilicate Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Saker S; El-Shahat S; Ghazy M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 27861648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of conical plus octagonal internal connection on implant survival and success rate: a retrospective study of 66 fixtures.
Lopez MA; Andreasi Bassi M; Confalone L; Gaudio RM; Lombardo L; Lauritano D
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2016; 30(2 Suppl 1):49-54. PubMed ID: 27469548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
