BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27861876)

  • 1. Sibship Analysis Based on Parental Genotype Reconstruction from Any Number of Reference Siblings.
    Huang J; Huang Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):233-238. PubMed ID: 27861876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empowering sibship analyses with reference pedigrees.
    Wenk RE; Shao A
    Transfusion; 2012 Dec; 52(12):2614-9. PubMed ID: 22486247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. About the power of biostatistics in sibling analysis-comparison of empirical and simulated data.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Podruks E; Schwark T; Göpel W; Fimmers R; Poetsch M
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 Nov; 129(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 26292643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of sibship in any two persons.
    Wenk RE; Traver M; Chiafari FA
    Transfusion; 1996 Mar; 36(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 8604513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Application of ITO method and discriminant functions in full sibling and half sibling identification].
    Lu HL; Zhou KW; Lü DJ; Yao YN; Zhang YQ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 25(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 19537252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Problems of assessing sibship probabilities by means of genetic analysis].
    Mályusz V; Poetsch M; Simeoni E; Schwark T; Manfred O; von Wurmb-Schwark N
    Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 16948260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Algorithms of likelihood ratio for discriminating full sibling from half sibling].
    Zhao SM; Zhang LN; Zhang SH; Zhang N; Zhao ZM; Li CT
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 28(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 22619804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sibling assessment based on likelihood ratio and total number of shared alleles using 21 short tandem repeat loci included in the GlobalFiler™ kit.
    Inoue H; Manabe S; Fujii K; Iwashima Y; Miyama S; Tanaka A; Saitoh H; Iwase H; Tamaki K; Sekiguchi K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Mar; 19():122-6. PubMed ID: 26254055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Considerations for the interpretation of STR results in cases of questioned half-sibship.
    Allen RW; Fu J; Reid TM; Baird M
    Transfusion; 2007 Mar; 47(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 17319834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. General Formulas for Calculating Commonly Used Kinship Index.
    Xiao C; Huang DX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):276-282. PubMed ID: 37517016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An improvement on the maximum likelihood reconstruction of pedigrees from marker data.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2013 Aug; 111(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 23612692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Establishment of universal algorithms for commonly used kinship indices between two individuals].
    Zhao SM; Zhang SH; Que TZ; Zhao ZM; Lin Y; Li L; Li CT
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 27(5):330-3. PubMed ID: 22259857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Mo SK; Liu YC; Wang SQ; Bo XC; Li Z; Chen Y; Ni M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():161-168. PubMed ID: 26952733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calculation of Likelihood Ratios for Incest Cases Using IBD Patterns.
    Lü DJ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):283-287. PubMed ID: 37517017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likelihood-ratio affected sib-pair tests applied to multiply affected sibships: issues of power and type I error rate.
    Holmans P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11119296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application of Multiple Genetic Markers in a Case of Determination of Half Sibling].
    Yang X; Shi MS; Yuan L; Lu D
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 32(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 27295857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resolving paternity relationships using X-chromosome STRs and Bayesian networks.
    Hatsch D; Keyser C; Hienne R; Bertrand L
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):895-7. PubMed ID: 17553082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IPED2: Inheritance Path Based Pedigree Reconstruction Algorithm for Complicated Pedigrees.
    He D; Wang Z; Parida L; Eskin E
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2017; 14(5):1094-1103. PubMed ID: 28368828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. General derivation of the sets of pedigrees with the same kinship coefficients.
    Pinto N; Silva PV; Amorim A
    Hum Hered; 2010; 70(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 20720433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A test for carrion fly full siblings: a tool for detecting postmortem relocation of a corpse.
    Picard CJ; Wells JD
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):535-8. PubMed ID: 22103930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.