203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27862666)
1. Filling the void-enriching the feature space of successful stopping.
Huster RJ; Schneider S; Lavallee CF; Enriquez-Geppert S; Herrmann CS
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Mar; 38(3):1333-1346. PubMed ID: 27862666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in unity: The go/no-go and stop signal tasks rely on different mechanisms.
Raud L; Westerhausen R; Dooley N; Huster RJ
Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 210():116582. PubMed ID: 31987997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults.
Schmajuk M; Liotti M; Busse L; Woldorff MG
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(3):384-95. PubMed ID: 16095637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of the cingulate cortex as neural generator of the N200 and P300 in a tactile response inhibition task.
Huster RJ; Westerhausen R; Pantev C; Konrad C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Aug; 31(8):1260-71. PubMed ID: 20063362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional and effective connectivity of stopping.
Huster RJ; Plis SM; Lavallee CF; Calhoun VD; Herrmann CS
Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():120-128. PubMed ID: 24631789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality.
Bodmer B; Beste C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Apr; 38(4):1941-1951. PubMed ID: 28045223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Connectivity and local activity within the fronto-posterior brain network in schizophrenia.
Sharma A; Weisbrod M; Bender S
Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2013; 62():181-96. PubMed ID: 24053040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intracranial EEG reveals a time- and frequency-specific role for the right inferior frontal gyrus and primary motor cortex in stopping initiated responses.
Swann N; Tandon N; Canolty R; Ellmore TM; McEvoy LK; Dreyer S; DiSano M; Aron AR
J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 29(40):12675-85. PubMed ID: 19812342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.
Kok A; Ramautar JR; De Ruiter MB; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 14692996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brain oscillation and connectivity during a chemistry visual working memory task.
Huang LY; She HC; Chou WC; Chuang MH; Duann JR; Jung TP
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 23850831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to stop or change a motor response: Laplacian and independent component analysis approach.
Rangel-Gomez M; Knight RT; Krämer UM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Sep; 97(3):233-44. PubMed ID: 25660306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural and behavioral correlates of selective stopping: Evidence for a different strategy adoption.
Sánchez-Carmona AJ; Albert J; Hinojosa JA
Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():279-293. PubMed ID: 27355436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinguishing stimulus and response codes in theta oscillations in prefrontal areas during inhibitory control of automated responses.
Mückschel M; Dippel G; Beste C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5681-5690. PubMed ID: 28782869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Establishing a Right Frontal Beta Signature for Stopping Action in Scalp EEG: Implications for Testing Inhibitory Control in Other Task Contexts.
Wagner J; Wessel JR; Ghahremani A; Aron AR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 30(1):107-118. PubMed ID: 28880766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier.
DeLaRosa BL; Spence JS; Motes MA; To W; Vanneste S; Kraut MA; Hart J
Brain Behav; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e01902. PubMed ID: 33078586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Common and Unique Inhibitory Control Signatures of Action-Stopping and Attentional Capture Suggest That Actions Are Stopped in Two Stages.
Tatz JR; Soh C; Wessel JR
J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(42):8826-8838. PubMed ID: 34493541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A long-range cortical network emerging with theta oscillation in a mental task.
Mizuhara H; Wang LQ; Kobayashi K; Yamaguchi Y
Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(8):1233-8. PubMed ID: 15167540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural aftereffects of errors in a stop-signal task.
Beyer F; Münte TF; Fischer J; Krämer UM
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3304-12. PubMed ID: 23063968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neural Architecture of Selective Stopping Strategies: Distinct Brain Activity Patterns Are Associated with Attentional Capture But Not with Outright Stopping.
Sebastian A; Rössler K; Wibral M; Mobascher A; Lieb K; Jung P; Tüscher O
J Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 37(40):9785-9794. PubMed ID: 28887387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
