392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27863628)
1. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns.
Shang Y; Hao W; Gao Z; Xu C; Ru Y; Ni D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():141-145. PubMed ID: 27863628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical analysis of three newborn hearing screening protocols.
Freitas VS; Alvarenga Kde F; Bevilacqua MC; Martinez MA; Costa OA
Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19838565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes with OAE and AABR screening in the first 48 h--Implications for newborn hearing screening in developing countries.
van Dyk M; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1034-40. PubMed ID: 25921078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal hearing screening - does failure in TEOAE screening matter when the AABR test is passed?
Gellrich D; Gröger M; Echternach M; Eder K; Huber P
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1273-1283. PubMed ID: 37831131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem responses for pre-discharge neonatal hearing screening.
Clarke P; Iqbal M; Mitchell S
Int J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 42(8):443-7. PubMed ID: 14658852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Neonatal hearing screening. A comparison of automatic auditory brainstem audiometry and otoacoustic emissions].
Pedersen L; Møller TR; Wetke R; Ovesen T
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(8):642-6. PubMed ID: 18364157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response in Neonatal Hearing Screening.
Levit Y; Himmelfarb M; Dollberg S
Pediatrics; 2015 Sep; 136(3):e641-7. PubMed ID: 26324873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.
Vohr BR; Oh W; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Gabbard S; Lemons J; Papile LA; Pye R
J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 11487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Newborn hearing screening].
Babac S; Djerić D; Ivanković Z
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2007; 135(5-6):264-8. PubMed ID: 17633310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neonatal hearing screening of high-risk infants using automated auditory brainstem response: a retrospective analysis of referral rates.
McGurgan IJ; Patil N
Ir J Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 183(3):405-10. PubMed ID: 24097063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Two-tier screening process (TEOAE/AABR) reduces recall rates in newborn hearing screening].
Helge T; Werle E; Barnick M; Wegner C; Rühe B; Aust G; Rossi R
HNO; 2005 Jul; 53(7):655-60. PubMed ID: 15565423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening.
Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence and referral rates in neonatal hearing screening program using two step hearing screening protocol in Chennai - A prospective study.
Vignesh SS; Jaya V; Sasireka BI; Sarathy K; Vanthana M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 79(10):1745-7. PubMed ID: 26296879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early detection of neonatal hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response over 10 years of experience.
Escobar-Ipuz FA; Soria-Bretones C; García-Jiménez MA; Cueto EM; Torres Aranda AM; Sotos JM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109647. PubMed ID: 31470205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Universal newborn hearing screening using A-TEOAE and A-ABR: The experience of a large public hospital.
Cianfrone F; Mammarella F; Ralli M; Evetovic V; Pianura CM; Bellocchi G
J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2018; 11(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 29689750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving newborn hearing screening: Are automated auditory brainstem response ear inserts an effective option?
Chan KT; Wong EC; Law CW; Chong HM; McPherson B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1920-5. PubMed ID: 26412459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
