These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27863856)

  • 1. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark.
    Kim JE; Amelya A; Shin Y; Shim JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):755-761. PubMed ID: 27863856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study.
    Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.
    Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans.
    Kanjanasavitree P; Thammajaruk P; Guazzato M
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104266. PubMed ID: 35995084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the impact of the extent of the partially edentulous area on the accuracy of two intraoral scanners.
    Alfaraj A; Khanlar LN; Lin WS; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):163.e1-163.e8. PubMed ID: 37891042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of impression-making methods in edentulous arches: An in vitro study encompassing conventional and digital methods.
    Li J; Moon HS; Kim JH; Yoon HI; Oh KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 33583617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature].
    Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device.
    Iturrate M; Eguiraun H; Etxaniz O; Solaberrieta E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):447-454. PubMed ID: 30554826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review.
    Kihara H; Hatakeyama W; Komine F; Takafuji K; Takahashi T; Yokota J; Oriso K; Kondo H
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Apr; 64(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 31474576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance.
    Atieh MA; Ritter AV; Ko CC; Duqum I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 28222869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study.
    Braian M; Wennerberg A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.
    Zhang YJ; Shi JY; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 May; 14(2):157-179. PubMed ID: 34006079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners.
    Bohner LOL; De Luca Canto G; Marció BS; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Tortamano Neto P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):617-623. PubMed ID: 28385434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.
    Imburgia M; Logozzo S; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Mangano C; Mangano FG
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 28577366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
    Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The trueness of scans using one intraoral scanner in different partially edentulous conditions.
    Majeed-Saidan A; Dutra V; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Alfaraj A; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):588-593. PubMed ID: 35977883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws.
    Patzelt SB; Vonau S; Stampf S; Att W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Aug; 144(8):914-20. PubMed ID: 23904578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.