These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27863856)

  • 21. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study.
    Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 26794703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of artificial landmarks of the prefabricated auxiliary devices located at different arch positions on the accuracy of complete-arch edentulous digital implant scanning: An in-vitro study.
    Wu HK; Chen G; Zhang Z; Lin X; Huang X; Deng F; Li Y
    J Dent; 2024 Jan; 140():104802. PubMed ID: 38072336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis.
    Schimmel M; Akino N; Srinivasan M; Wittneben JG; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1839-1847. PubMed ID: 32812098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study.
    Mangano FG; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Imburgia M; Mangano C; Admakin O
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31170969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners.
    Lee JJ; Jeong ID; Park JY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 27666500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Applying intraoral scanner to residual ridge in edentulous regions: in vitro evaluation of inter-operator validity to confirm trueness.
    Tasaka A; Uekubo Y; Mitsui T; Kasahara T; Takanashi T; Homma S; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Yoshinari M; Yajima Y; Sakurai K; Yamashita S
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Dec; 19(1):264. PubMed ID: 31791324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: An
    Sason GK; Mistry G; Tabassum R; Shetty O
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 29692563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of Scanned Stock Abutments Using Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.
    Kim JE; Hong YS; Kang YJ; Kim JH; Shim JS
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):797-803. PubMed ID: 31250506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Accuracy Between a Conventional and Two Digital Intraoral Impression Techniques.
    Malik J; Rodriguez J; Weisbloom M; Petridis H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29518805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of titanium dioxide and composite on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner for bilateral upper posterior edentulous jaw (Kennedy class I) scanning: An in vitro study.
    Vo HM; Huynh NC; Tran TT; Hoang HT; Nguyen AT
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104747. PubMed ID: 37863172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trueness of intraoral scanning of edentulous arches: A comparative clinical study.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al-Kaff FT
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 35997079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners.
    Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience.
    Lim JH; Park JM; Kim M; Heo SJ; Myung JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 28689906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy.
    Marghalani A; Weber HP; Finkelman M; Kudara Y; El Rafie K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):574-579. PubMed ID: 28927923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning of Edentulous Jaws with and without Resin Markers.
    Tao C; Zhao YJ; Sun YC; Heng MD; Xie QF; Pan SX
    Chin J Dent Res; 2020; 23(4):265-271. PubMed ID: 33491358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.