These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27864643)

  • 1. Robust representations of individual faces in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) but not monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Taubert J; Weldon KB; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Mar; 20(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 27864643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Parr LA; Winslow JT; Hopkins WD; de Waal FB
    J Comp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 114(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 10739311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Taubert J; Qureshi AA; Parr LA
    J Comp Psychol; 2012 Nov; 126(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 22390621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Taubert J; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jan; 14(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 20632050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of familiarity and viewpoint on face recognition in chimpanzees.
    Parr LA; Siebert E; Taubert J
    Perception; 2011; 40(7):863-72. PubMed ID: 22128558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.
    Parr LA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 21784381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.
    Taubert J; Aagten-Murphy D; Parr LA
    Perception; 2012; 41(4):460-73. PubMed ID: 22896918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seeing two faces together: preference formation in humans and rhesus macaques.
    Méary D; Li Z; Li W; Guo K; Pascalis O
    Anim Cogn; 2014 Sep; 17(5):1107-19. PubMed ID: 24638876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual kin recognition in nonhuman primates: (Pan troglodytes and Macaca mulatta): inbreeding avoidance or male distinctiveness?
    Parr LA; Heintz M; Lonsdorf E; Wroblewski E
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Nov; 124(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 21090888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: a comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys.
    Taubert J; Parr LA
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 19815323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estradiol selectively affects processing of conspecifics' faces in female rhesus monkeys.
    Lacreuse A; Herndon JG
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2003 Oct; 28(7):885-905. PubMed ID: 12892656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human and chimpanzee face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): role of exposure and impact on categorical perception.
    Martin-Malivel J; Okada K
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 121(6):1145-55. PubMed ID: 18085867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The organization of conspecific face space in nonhuman primates.
    Parr LA; Taubert J; Little AC; Hancock PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2411-34. PubMed ID: 22670823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.
    Parr LA; Heintz M; Pradhan G
    J Comp Psychol; 2008 Nov; 122(4):390-402. PubMed ID: 19014263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory-visual intermodal matching based on individual recognition in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).
    Martinez L; Matsuzawa T
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Oct; 12 Suppl 1():S71-85. PubMed ID: 19701656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient search for a face by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
    Tomonaga M; Imura T
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jul; 5():11437. PubMed ID: 26180944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How the Thatcher illusion reveals evolutionary differences in the face processing of primates.
    Weldon KB; Taubert J; Smith CL; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Sep; 16(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 23420511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.
    Parr LA; Taubert J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jul; 278(1714):1964-72. PubMed ID: 21123266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Agrillo C; Parrish AE; Beran MJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2014 Nov; 128(4):402-13. PubMed ID: 25133464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Hopkins WD; Washburn DA
    Anim Cogn; 2002 Mar; 5(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 11957399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.