BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27864921)

  • 1. What is the role of retroperitoneal exploration in optimally debulked stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study.
    Rungruang BJ; Miller A; Krivak TC; Horowitz NS; Rodriguez N; Hamilton CA; Backes FJ; Carson LF; Friedlander M; Mutch DG; Goodheart MJ; Tewari KS; Wenham RM; Bookman MA; Maxwell GL; Richard SD
    Cancer; 2017 May; 123(6):985-993. PubMed ID: 27864921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should stage IIIC ovarian cancer be further stratified by intraperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal only disease?: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
    Rungruang B; Miller A; Richard SD; Hamilton CA; Rodriguez N; Bookman MA; Maxwell GL; Krivak TC; Horowitz NS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22032836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the primary route of spread have a prognostic significance in stage III non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer?
    Sahin H; Meydanli MM; Sari ME; Yalcin I; Çoban G; Ozkan NT; Cuylan ZF; Erdem B; Gungorduk K; Akbayir Ö; Dede M; Salman MC; Güngör T; Ayhan A
    J Ovarian Res; 2018 Mar; 11(1):21. PubMed ID: 29506569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The prognostic relevance of node metastases in optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer.
    Bachmann C; Brucker SY; Kraemer B; Rothmund R; Staebler A; Fend F; Wallwiener D; Grischke EM
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 141(8):1475-80. PubMed ID: 25739827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of survival outcomes in optimally and maximally cytoreduced stage IIIC ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: Women with only peritoneal tumor burden versus women with both peritoneal and lymphogenous dissemination.
    Selcuk I; Meydanli MM; Yalcin I; Gungorduk K; Akgol S; Çelik H; Ayhan A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Oct; 45(10):2074-2081. PubMed ID: 31373110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical significance of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy during interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.
    Iwase H; Takada T; Iitsuka C; Nomura H; Abe A; Taniguchi T; Takizawa K
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Oct; 26(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 26197771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there any association between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival benefit in advanced stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients?
    Sakai K; Kajiyama H; Umezu T; Shibata K; Mizuno M; Suzuki S; Kawai M; Nagasaka T; Kikkawa F
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1018-23. PubMed ID: 22568659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
    Bian C; Yao K; Li L; Yi T; Zhao X
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 293(1):163-168. PubMed ID: 26198168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer is feasible with high completion rates, low complications, and acceptable patient outcomes.
    Skaznik-Wikiel ME; Lesnock JL; McBee WC; Beriwal S; Zorn KK; Richard SD; Krivak TC; Edwards RP
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 22080886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does time interval between surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration in advanced ovarian cancer carry a prognostic impact? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study ancillary study.
    Garcia-Soto AE; Java JJ; Nieves Neira W; Pearson JM; Cohn DE; Lele SB; Tewari KS; Walker JL; Alvarez Secord A; Armstrong DK; Copeland LJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Dec; 143(3):484-489. PubMed ID: 27726923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moving beyond "complete surgical resection" and "optimal": Is low-volume residual disease another option for primary debulking surgery?
    Manning-Geist BL; Hicks-Courant K; Gockley AA; Clark RM; Del Carmen MG; Growdon WB; Horowitz NS; Berkowitz RS; Muto MG; Worley MJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 150(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 29933927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for surgical staging.
    Powless CA; Aletti GD; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Cliby WA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 21636114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of primary intraperitoneal chemotherapy to consolidation intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimally resected advanced ovarian cancer.
    Suidan RS; St Clair CM; Lee SJ; Barlin JN; Long Roche KC; Tanner EJ; Sonoda Y; Barakat RR; Zivanovic O; Chi DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Sep; 134(3):468-72. PubMed ID: 25042672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of pelvic retroperitoneal invasion and distant nodal metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Pereira A; Pérez-Medina T; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM; Rodríguez-Tapia A; Pérez-Milán F; Ortiz-Quintana L
    Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 24183480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is it justified to classify patients to Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer based on nodal involvement only?
    Cliby WA; Aletti GD; Wilson TO; Podratz KC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):797-801. PubMed ID: 17052746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lymph Node Involvement Pattern and Survival Differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 Ovarian Cancer Patients After Primary Complete Tumor Debulking Surgery: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network.
    Gasimli K; Braicu EI; Nassir M; Richter R; Babayeva A; Chekerov R; Darb-Esfahani S; Sehouli J; Muallem MZ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1279-86. PubMed ID: 26832880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The addition of extensive upper abdominal surgery to achieve optimal cytoreduction improves survival in patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Eisenhauer EL; Abu-Rustum NR; Sonoda Y; Levine DA; Poynor EA; Aghajanian C; Jarnagin WR; DeMatteo RP; D'Angelica MI; Barakat RR; Chi DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):1083-90. PubMed ID: 16890277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Re-evaluation of interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer].
    Ma Y; Li Y; Cui H; Liang XD; Tang ZJ; Li XP; Zhao Y; Wei LH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 47(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 22883524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patterns of Recurrence and Clinical Outcome of Patients With Stage IIIC to Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Complete Response After Primary Debulking Surgery Plus Chemotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery: An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Study.
    Gadducci A; Cosio S; Zizioli V; Notaro S; Tana R; Panattoni A; Sartori E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jan; 27(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 27870700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing the treatment of ovarian cancer: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking versus primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancers likely to have suboptimal resection.
    Gill SE; McGree ME; Weaver AL; Cliby WA; Langstraat CL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 144(2):266-273. PubMed ID: 27916269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.