These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27864934)

  • 21. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples.
    Liu JY
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of contact force on forensic trace collection efficiency when sampling textiles with adhesive tape.
    Damsteeg-van Berkel S; Beemster F; Dankelman J; Loeve AJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 May; 298():278-283. PubMed ID: 30925346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An optimized procedure for obtaining DNA from fired and unfired ammunition.
    Montpetit S; O'Donnell P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():70-74. PubMed ID: 25828369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High-throughput DNA extraction of forensic adhesive tapes.
    Forsberg C; Jansson L; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():158-163. PubMed ID: 27448236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Forensic touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces - A review.
    Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Austin JJ
    Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):206-215. PubMed ID: 32381237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A protocol for direct and rapid multiplex PCR amplification on forensically relevant samples.
    Verheij S; Harteveld J; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 21530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of offender DNA following skin-to-skin contact with a victim.
    Bowman ZE; Mosse KSA; Sungaila AM; van Oorschot RAH; Hartman D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():252-259. PubMed ID: 30268683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recovery of DNA from latent fingerprint tape lifts archived against matte acetate.
    Steadman SA; Hoofer SR; Geering SC; King S; Bennett MA
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):777-82. PubMed ID: 25702951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of the M-Vac® wet-vacuum system as a method for DNA recovery.
    Vickar T; Bache K; Daniel B; Frascione N
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 29895461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of swabbing solutions on DNA recovery from touch samples.
    Thomasma SM; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 23278347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identification using DNA from skin contact: case reports.
    Tokutomi T; Takada Y; Kanetake J; Mukaida M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S576-7. PubMed ID: 19289299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification and persistence of Pinus pollen DNA on cotton fabrics: A forensic application.
    Schield C; Campelli C; Sycalik J; Randle C; Hughes-Stamm S; Gangitano D
    Sci Justice; 2016 Jan; 56(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 26746823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A novel cell culture model as a tool for forensic biology experiments and validations.
    Feine I; Shpitzen M; Roth J; Gafny R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():114-119. PubMed ID: 27376694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis.
    Schulte J; Rittiner N; Seiberle I; Kron S; Schulz I
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1133-1147. PubMed ID: 37282776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An improved process for the collection and DNA analysis of fired cartridge cases.
    Bille TW; Fahrig G; Weitz SM; Peiffer GA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102238. PubMed ID: 32028222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
    Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visualising latent DNA on swabs.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride P; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():115-123. PubMed ID: 30195152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ESDA®-Lite collection of DNA from latent fingerprints on documents.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():8-12. PubMed ID: 25479402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.