158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27865561)
1. The cost effectiveness of vacuum-assisted versus core-needle versus surgical biopsy of breast lesions.
Fernández-García P; Marco-Doménech SF; Lizán-Tudela L; Ibáñez-Gual MV; Navarro-Ballester A; Casanovas-Feliu E
Radiologia; 2017; 59(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 27865561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound-Guided Core-Needle Versus Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: A Cost Analysis Based on the American Society of Breast Surgeons' Mastery of Breast Surgery Registry.
Grady I; Vasquez T; Tawfik S; Grady S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):676-682. PubMed ID: 27714540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effective use of breast biopsy techniques in a Veterans health care system.
Hatmaker AR; Donahue RM; Tarpley JL; Pearson AS
Am J Surg; 2006 Nov; 192(5):e37-41. PubMed ID: 17071179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Sama MP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jul; 175(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10882245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions.
Tsai HY; Huang ST; Chao MF; Kan JY; Hsu JS; Hou MF; Chiu HC
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():108982. PubMed ID: 32334370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stereotactic breast biopsy of noncalcified lesions: a cost-minimization analysis comparing 14-gauge multipass automated core biopsy to 14- and 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Soo MS; Kliewer MA; Ghate S; Helsper RS; Rosen EL
Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 15859015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods.
Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Lee SH; Chung HK; Cho KS; Park IA; Noh DY
Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 15968149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions.
Bruening W; Fontanarosa J; Tipton K; Treadwell JR; Launders J; Schoelles K
Ann Intern Med; 2010 Feb; 152(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 20008742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of sonographically guided vacuum-assisted and automated core-needle breast biopsy methods].
Semiz Oysu A; Kaya H; Güllüoğlu B; Aribal E
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Mar; 10(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 15054703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonography-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications: Comparison of the diagnostic yield of calcified cores and non-calcified cores on specimen radiographs.
Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Park SH; Lyou CY; Park IA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Mar; 51(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 19912076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound-guided diagnostic breast biopsy methodology: retrospective comparison of the 8-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy approach versus the spring-loaded 14-gauge core biopsy approach.
Povoski SP; Jimenez RE; Wang WP
World J Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 9():87. PubMed ID: 21835024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of hydrogel plugs in CT-guided lung biopsies.
Marco-Doménech SF; Fernández-García P; Navarro-Ballester A; Cifrián-Pérez M; Escobar-Valero Á; Ibáñez-Gual MV
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2019; 61(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 30772002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision.
Darling ML; Smith DN; Lester SC; Kaelin C; Selland DL; Denison CM; DiPiro PJ; Rose DI; Rhei E; Meyer JE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1341-6. PubMed ID: 11044038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device to a vacuum-assisted core needle sampling device for breast biopsy: initial experience.
Killebrew LK; Oneson RH
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 16848839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy: comparison of breast biopsy methods.
Liberman L; Gougoutas CA; Zakowski MF; LaTrenta LR; Abramson AF; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 177(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 11418420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of the twinkling artifact on Doppler ultrasound for the detection of breast microcalcifications.
Relea A; Alonso JA; González M; Zornoza C; Bahamonde S; Viñuela BE; Encinas MB
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2018; 60(5):413-423. PubMed ID: 29907260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of stereotactic 11-g vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis in Austria.
Gruber R; Walter E; Helbich TH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jan; 77(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 19853395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness.
Liberman L; Feng TL; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF
Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 9722851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
