195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27865849)
1. Evaluation of existing (Q)SAR models for skin and eye irritation and corrosion to use for REACH registration.
Verheyen GR; Braeken E; Van Deun K; Van Miert S
Toxicol Lett; 2017 Jan; 265():47-52. PubMed ID: 27865849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro tests within the REACH information strategies.
Louekari K; Sihvonen K; Kuittinen M; Sømnes V
Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Aug; 34(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 16945005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification and labeling of industrial products with extreme pH by making use of in vitro methods for the assessment of skin and eye irritation and corrosion in a weight of evidence approach.
Scheel J; Heppenheimer A; Lehringer E; Kreutz J; Poth A; Ammann H; Reisinger K; Banduhn N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1435-47. PubMed ID: 21550395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CON4EI: Evaluation of QSAR models for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals.
Geerts L; Adriaens E; Alépée N; Guest R; Willoughby JA; Kandarova H; Drzewiecka A; Fochtman P; Verstraelen S; Van Rompay AR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Jun; 49():90-98. PubMed ID: 28941583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of TOPKAT, Toxtree, and Derek Nexus in Silico Models for Ocular Irritation and Development of a Knowledge-Based Framework To Improve the Prediction of Severe Irritation.
Bhhatarai B; Wilson DM; Parks AK; Carney EW; Spencer PJ
Chem Res Toxicol; 2016 May; 29(5):810-22. PubMed ID: 27018716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the eye irritating properties of chemicals by applying alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye test: the use of QSARs and in vitro tests for the classification of eye irritation.
Gerner I; Liebsch M; Spielmann H
Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Jun; 33(3):215-37. PubMed ID: 16180977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of SARs for the prediction of eye irritation/corrosion potential: structural inclusion rules in the BfR decision support system.
Tsakovska I; Saliner AG; Netzeva T; Pavan M; Worth AP
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(3-4):221-35. PubMed ID: 17514567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: "Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals".
Ulmer WR
Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(6):475-6; author response 476-8. PubMed ID: 14680995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A three-tier QSAR modeling strategy for estimating eye irritation potential of diverse chemicals in rabbit for regulatory purposes.
Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():282-91. PubMed ID: 27018829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of eye irritation from organic chemicals using membrane-interaction QSAR analysis.
Kulkarni A; Hopfinger AJ; Osborne R; Bruner LH; Thompson ED
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):335-45. PubMed ID: 11158727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Introduction of in vitro data into local irritation/corrosion testing strategies by means of SAR considerations: assessment of chemicals.
Gerner I; Schlede E
Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 127(1-3):169-75. PubMed ID: 12052655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An alternative QSAR-based approach for predicting the bioconcentration factor for regulatory purposes.
Gissi A; Gadaleta D; Floris M; Olla S; Carotti A; Novellino E; Benfenati E; Nicolotti O
ALTEX; 2014; 31(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 24247988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals.
Stobbe JL; Drake KD; Maier KJ
Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12745991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integration of QSAR models for bioconcentration suitable for REACH.
Gissi A; Nicolotti O; Carotti A; Gadaleta D; Lombardo A; Benfenati E
Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jul; 456-457():325-32. PubMed ID: 23624006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eye irritation.
Eskes C; Bessou S; Bruner L; Curren R; Harbell J; Jones P; Kreiling R; Liebsch M; McNamee P; Pape W; Prinsen MK; Seidle T; Vanparys P; Worth A; Zuang V
Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():47-81. PubMed ID: 16194141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of the chemical-induced eye injury using a weight-of-evidence (WoE) battery of 21 artificial neural network (ANN) c-QSAR models (QSAR-21): part I: irritation potential.
Verma RP; Matthews EJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):318-30. PubMed ID: 25497990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skin irritation and corrosion.
Zuang V; Alonso MA; Botham PA; Eskes C; Fentem J; Liebsch M; van de Sandt JJ
Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():35-46. PubMed ID: 16194140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Leiden reconstructed human epidermal model as a tool for the evaluation of the skin corrosion and irritation potential according to the ECVAM guidelines.
El Ghalbzouri A; Siamari R; Willemze R; Ponec M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Aug; 22(5):1311-20. PubMed ID: 18474418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CON4EI: CONsortium for in vitro Eye Irritation testing strategy.
Van Rompay AR; Verstraelen S; Blaauboer BJ
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Jun; 49():1. PubMed ID: 29685209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
