These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27865942)

  • 1. Outcomes of laparoscopic sacropexy in women over 70: A comparative study.
    Boudy AS; Thubert T; Vinchant M; Hermieu JF; Villefranque V; Deffieux X
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():178-183. PubMed ID: 27865942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Feasibility and short-term morbidity of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with previous genital prolapse surgery].
    Menard JP; Perez T; Agostini A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 May; 39(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20363568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early safety and efficacy outcomes of a novel technique of sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse.
    Rajshekhar S; Mukhopadhyay S; Morris E
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 135(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 27498595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transvaginal treatment of anterior and apical genital prolapses using an Ultra lightweight mesh: Restorelle
    Ferry P; Bertherat P; Gauthier A; Villet R; Del Piano F; Hamid D; Fernandez H; Broux PL; Salet-Lizée D; Vincens E; Ntshaykolo P; Debodinance P; Pocholle P; Thirouard Y; de Tayrac R
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 47(9):443-449. PubMed ID: 29920380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].
    Han JS; Zhang K; Zhu FL; Yao Y; Liang HM; Zhou LF; Guo HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 21426766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic sacropexy: a systematic analysis and a comparison with laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Joukhadar R; Baum S; Radosa J; Gerlinger C; Hamza A; Juhasz-Böss I; Solomayer EF
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 295(3):641-649. PubMed ID: 27896472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Serious complications and recurrences after pelvic organ prolapse surgery for 2309 women in the VIGI-MESH registry.
    Fritel X; de Tayrac R; de Keizer J; Campagne-Loiseau S; Cosson M; Ferry P; Deffieux X; Lucot JP; Wagner L; Debodinance P; Saussine C; Pizzoferrato AC; Carlier-Guérin C; Thubert T; Panel L; Bosset PO; Nkounkou E; Ramanah R; Boisramé T; Charles T; Raiffort C; Charvériat A; Ragot S; Fauconnier A
    BJOG; 2022 Mar; 129(4):656-663. PubMed ID: 34541781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Yan L; Lu S; Zhao C; Lei L; Liu L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
    Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
    Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacropexy on one hundred fifteen cases.
    Serbetcioglu GC; Simsek SY; Alemdaroglu S; Aytac PC; Kalayci H; Celik H
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 49(7):101795. PubMed ID: 32474191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simplified laparoscopic sacropexy avoiding deep vaginal dissection.
    Cosma S; Petruzzelli P; Chiadò Fiorio Tin M; Parisi S; Olearo E; Fassio F; Zizzo R; Danese S; Benedetto C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Nov; 143(2):239-245. PubMed ID: 30076597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years.
    Vandendriessche D; Sussfeld J; Giraudet G; Lucot JP; Behal H; Cosson M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 27549223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation on clinical effectiveness of modified laparoscopic sacral colpopexy].
    Zhang XW; Xu L; Li YX; Gan YP; Chen LQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):570-4. PubMed ID: 24199920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Placement of Synthetic Mesh at Time of Sacrocolpopexy.
    Nosti PA; Carter CM; Sokol AI; Tefera E; Iglesia CB; Park AJ; Gutman RE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 26571429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Novel Operative Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Utilizing a MRI-Visible Mesh Implant: Safety and Outcome of Modified Laparoscopic Bilateral Sacropexy.
    Joukhadar R; Meyberg-Solomayer G; Hamza A; Radosa J; Bader W; Barski D; Ismaeel F; Schneider G; Solomayer E; Baum S
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():860784. PubMed ID: 25961042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mesh-related complications in single-incision transvaginal mesh (TVM) and laparoscopic abdominal sacrocolpopexy (LASC).
    Li YL; Chang YW; Yang TH; Wu LY; Chuang FC; Kung FT; Huang KH
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 32039799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midterm prospective comparison of vaginal repair with mesh vs Prolift system devices for prolapse.
    Chen YS; Cao Q; Ding JX; Hu CD; Feng WW; Hua KQ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Oct; 164(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 22771224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Functional results and quality of life of laparoscopic promontofixation in the cure of genital prolapse].
    Bui C; Ballester M; Chéreau E; Guillo E; Daraï E
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Oct; 38(10):563-8. PubMed ID: 20864375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.