104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27866172)
1. What Does the WRAML2 Core Battery Measure? Utilizing Exploratory and Confirmatory Techniques to Disclose Higher Order Structure.
McGill RJ; Dombrowski SC
Assessment; 2018 Sep; 25(6):729-743. PubMed ID: 27866172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Construct validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth UK Edition with a referred Irish sample: Wechsler and Cattell-Horn-Carroll model comparisons with 15 subtests.
Canivez GL; Watkins MW; Good R; James K; James T
Br J Educ Psychol; 2017 Sep; 87(3):383-407. PubMed ID: 28374453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: direct versus indirect hierarchical structures.
Canivez GL
Sch Psychol Q; 2014 Mar; 29(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 23895320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Four- and five-factor models of the WAIS-IV in a clinical sample: Variations in indicator configuration and factor correlational structure.
Staffaroni AM; Eng ME; Moses JA; Zeiner HK; Wickham RE
Psychol Assess; 2018 May; 30(5):693-706. PubMed ID: 29494190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bifactor structure of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence--Fourth Edition.
Watkins MW; Beaujean AA
Sch Psychol Q; 2014 Mar; 29(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 24188289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structural validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Confirmatory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests.
Canivez GL; Watkins MW; Dombrowski SC
Psychol Assess; 2017 Apr; 29(4):458-472. PubMed ID: 27442624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structure of the Woodcock-Johnson III cognitive tests in a referral sample of elementary school students.
Strickland T; Watkins MW; Caterino LC
Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):689-97. PubMed ID: 25642925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploratory Higher Order Analysis of the Luria Interpretive Model on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (KABC-II) School-Age Battery.
McGill RJ; Spurgin AR
Assessment; 2017 Jun; 24(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 26603113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Higher-order factor structures for the WISC-IV: implications for neuropsychological test interpretation.
Decker SL; Englund JA; Roberts AM
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2014; 3(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 24716872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examination of the structural, convergent, and incremental validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) with a clinical sample.
Nelson JM; Canivez GL
Psychol Assess; 2012 Mar; 24(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 21823799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re-examining the factor structure of the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning: implications for clinical interpretation.
Gioia GA
Assessment; 1998 Jun; 5(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 9626389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Latent structure of cognition in schizophrenia: a confirmatory factor analysis of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB).
McCleery A; Green MF; Hellemann GS; Baade LE; Gold JM; Keefe RS; Kern RS; Mesholam-Gately RI; Seidman LJ; Subotnik KL; Ventura J; Nuechterlein KH
Psychol Med; 2015; 45(12):2657-66. PubMed ID: 25916421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploratory and hierarchical factor analysis of the WJ-IV Cognitive at school age.
Dombrowski SC; McGill RJ; Canivez GL
Psychol Assess; 2017 Apr; 29(4):394-407. PubMed ID: 27280742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Dutch Version of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL).
Bouman Z; Hendriks MP; Kerkmeer MC; Kessels RP; Aldenkamp AP
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2015 May; 30(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 25791706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factor structure of the Differential Ability Scales-Second Edition: Exploratory and hierarchical factor analyses with the core subtests.
Canivez GL; McGill RJ
Psychol Assess; 2016 Nov; 28(11):1475-1488. PubMed ID: 27046278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: a cross-sectional survey.
Terluin B; Smits N; Brouwers EP; de Vet HC
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Sep; 14(1):130. PubMed ID: 27629535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bifactor analysis and construct validity of the HADS: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study in fibromyalgia patients.
Luciano JV; Barrada JR; Aguado J; Osma J; García-Campayo J
Psychol Assess; 2014 Jun; 26(2):395-406. PubMed ID: 24295235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status factor structure appropriate for inpatient psychiatry? An exploratory and higher-order analysis.
King LC; Bailie JM; Kinney DI; Nitch SR
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Nov; 27(7):756-65. PubMed ID: 22773323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the mental wellbeing of young Australians best represented by a single, multidimensional or bifactor model?
Hides L; Quinn C; Stoyanov S; Cockshaw W; Mitchell T; Kavanagh DJ
Psychiatry Res; 2016 Jul; 241():1-7. PubMed ID: 27152903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structural validation of the Self-Compassion Scale with a German general population sample.
Coroiu A; Kwakkenbos L; Moran C; Thombs B; Albani C; Bourkas S; Zenger M; Brahler E; Körner A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0190771. PubMed ID: 29408888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
