These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27866698)

  • 1. Comparison of margin discrepancy of complete gold crowns fabricated using printed, milled, and conventional hand-waxed patterns.
    Munoz S; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 27866698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Accuracy of Fit of Crowns Made From Wax Patterns Produced Conventionally (Hand Formed) and Via CAD/CAM Technology.
    Fathi HM; Al-Masoody AH; El-Ghezawi N; Johnson A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Mar; 24(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 27039473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
    Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems.
    Balkaya MC; Cinar A; Pamuk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):346-55. PubMed ID: 15798685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal discrepancy dimensions of single unit metal crowns fabricated by using CAD-CAM-milled acrylate resin polymer blocks or a conventional waxing technique.
    Lalande D; Hodd JA; Brousseau JS; Ramos V; Dunham D; Rueggeberg F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jun; 119(6):948-953. PubMed ID: 29042116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal Gap of Milled versus Cast Gold Restorations.
    Johnson R; Verrett R; Haney S; Mansueto M; Challa S
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jan; 26(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 26845495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal accuracy and internal fit of machine-milled and cast titanium crowns.
    Han HS; Yang HS; Lim HP; Park YJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 21889006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of vertical and horizontal discrepancy in cast copings for single-tooth implant-supported prostheses.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Zade MM
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 18784530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing.
    Farjood E; Vojdani M; Torabi K; Khaledi AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs.
    Alharbi N; Alharbi S; Cuijpers VMJI; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 29032176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.
    Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
    Dahl BE; Rønold HJ; Dahl JE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 27692584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the internal fit of metal crowns fabricated by traditional casting, computer numerical control milling, and three-dimensional printing.
    Chou WT; Chuang CC; Wang YB; Chiu HC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257158. PubMed ID: 34529710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.