619 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27867048)
1. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome.
Cela V; Freschi L; Simi G; Ruggiero M; Tana R; Pluchino N
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jul; 27(7):2638-43. PubMed ID: 23392975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site benign gynecologic surgery: a single-center experience.
Jayakumaran J; Wiercinski K; Buffington C; Caceres A
J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):447-454. PubMed ID: 29027639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Adoption of Single-port Laparoscopy for Full Staging of Endometrial Cancer: Surgical and Oncology Outcomes and Evaluation of the Learning Curve.
Barnes H; Harrison R; Huffman L; Medlin E; Spencer R; Al-Niaimi A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 28662990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic Transperitoneal Infrarenal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy With Double Docking: Technique, Learning Curve, and Perioperative Outcomes.
Ponce J; Barahona M; Pla MJ; Rovira J; Garcia-Tejedor A; Gil-Ibanez B; Gaspar HM; Sabria E; Bartolomé C; Marti L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 26898894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique in gynecology: a single surgeon's experience.
Yang YS; Oh KY; Hur MH; Kim SY; Yim HS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 25051536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure.
Franké O; Narducci F; Chereau-Ewald E; Orsoni M; Jauffret C; Leblanc E; Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 25514349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a University hospital.
Marengo F; Larraín D; Babilonti L; Spinillo A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):441-5. PubMed ID: 21779771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
