These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure? Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy. Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Adoption of Single-port Laparoscopy for Full Staging of Endometrial Cancer: Surgical and Oncology Outcomes and Evaluation of the Learning Curve. Barnes H; Harrison R; Huffman L; Medlin E; Spencer R; Al-Niaimi A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 28662990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer. Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series. Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women. Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique in gynecology: a single surgeon's experience. Yang YS; Oh KY; Hur MH; Kim SY; Yim HS J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 25051536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure. Franké O; Narducci F; Chereau-Ewald E; Orsoni M; Jauffret C; Leblanc E; Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 25514349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a University hospital. Marengo F; Larraín D; Babilonti L; Spinillo A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):441-5. PubMed ID: 21779771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]