146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27867288)
1. Visual-Functional Mismatch Between Coronary Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Quantitative Coronary Angiography.
Safi M; Eslami V; Namazi MH; Vakili H; Saadat H; Alipourparsa S; Adibi A; Movahed MR
Int J Angiol; 2016 Dec; 25(4):229-234. PubMed ID: 27867288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of Microvascular Function in Visual-Functional Mismatch Between Invasive Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve.
Yonetsu T; Murai T; Kanaji Y; Lee T; Matsuda J; Usui E; Hoshino M; Araki M; Niida T; Hada M; Ichijo S; Hamaya R; Kanno Y; Kakuta T
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 May; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 28566295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual-functional mismatch and results of fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary revascularization.
Chantadansuwan T; Kehasukcharoen W; Kanoksilp A; Saejueng B; Plainetr V; Sukhavasharin N; Tansuphaswadikul S; Hengrussamee K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Oct; 97(10):1064-76. PubMed ID: 25632623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determinants of visual-functional mismatches as assessed by coronary angiography and quantitative flow ratio.
Sugiyama T; Kanno Y; Hamaya R; Kanaji Y; Hoshino M; Murai T; Lee T; Yonetsu T; Sasano T; Kakuta T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(6):1047-1056. PubMed ID: 33197120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical-functional discordance between quantitative coronary angiography and diastolic pressure ratio during wave-free period.
Nakamura S; Yonetsu T; Hoshino M; Hada M; Yamaguchi M; Kanaji Y; Sugiyama T; Nakamura T; Matsuda J; Hatano Y; Umemoto T; Sasano T; Kakuta T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 33797173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lesion characteristics of coronary arteries associated with a mismatch between angiographic severity of stenosis and fractional flow reserve.
Arashi H; Yamaguchi J; Nakazawa M; Otsuki H; Haruki S; Nakao M; Kamishima K; Jujo K; Minami Y; Takagi A; Ogawa H; Hagiwara N
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2017 Apr; 32(2):120-126. PubMed ID: 27236812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
Park SJ; Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Shim EB; Kim YT; Yun SC; Song H; Lee JY; Kim WJ; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Mintz GS; Park SW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1029-36. PubMed ID: 23078732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-Dimensional Angiographic Characteristics versus Functional Stenosis Severity in Fractional and Coronary Flow Reserve Discordance: A DEFINE FLOW Sub Study.
Stegehuis V; Westra J; Boerhout C; Sejr-Hansen M; Eftekhari A; Mejía-Renteria H; Cambero-Madera M; Van Royen N; Matsuo H; Nakayama M; Siebes M; Christiansen EH; Van de Hoef T; Piek J
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35885676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence of visual-functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry.
Nakamura M; Yamagishi M; Ueno T; Hara K; Ishiwata S; Itoh T; Hamanaka I; Wakatsuki T; Sugano T; Kawai K; Akasaka T; Tanaka N; Kimura T
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2014 Oct; 29(4):300-8. PubMed ID: 24664513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine learning assessment of myocardial ischemia using angiography: Development and retrospective validation.
Hae H; Kang SJ; Kim WJ; Choi SY; Lee JG; Bae Y; Cho H; Yang DH; Kang JW; Lim TH; Lee CH; Kang DY; Lee PH; Ahn JM; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
PLoS Med; 2018 Nov; 15(11):e1002693. PubMed ID: 30422987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.
Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discrepancy in the assessment of jailed side branch lesions by visual estimation and quantitative coronary angiographic analysis: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
Shin DH; Koo BK; Waseda K; Park KW; Kim HS; Corral M; Lansky A; Honda Y; Fearon WF; Fitzgerald PJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 78(5):720-6. PubMed ID: 22025472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials.
Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between non-invasive coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve to assess the functional significance of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity.
Meimoun P; Sayah S; Luycx-Bore A; Boulanger J; Elmkies F; Benali T; Zemir H; Doutrelan L; Clerc J
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Apr; 24(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 21353763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of fractional flow reserve and angiographic characteristics after balloon angioplasty in de novo coronary lesions.
Chung JH; Lee KE; Her AY; Lee JM; Doh JH; Nam CW; Koo BK; Shin ES
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1945-1954. PubMed ID: 31214851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Severity of morphological lesion complexity affects fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenosis.
Takashima H; Waseda K; Gosho M; Kurita A; Ando H; Sakurai S; Maeda K; Kumagai S; Suzuki A; Amano T
J Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 66(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 25547739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity.
Fischer JJ; Samady H; McPherson JA; Sarembock IJ; Powers ER; Gimple LW; Ragosta M
Am J Cardiol; 2002 Aug; 90(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 12127605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stenotic flow reserve derived from quantitative coronary angiography has modest but incremental value in predicting functionally significant coronary stenosis as evaluated by fractional flow reserve.
Potter EL; Machado C; Malaiapan Y; Narayan O; Ko BS; Psaltis PJ; Munnur K; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Wong DT
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther; 2017 Feb; 7(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 28164013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex differences in the visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound versus fractional flow reserve.
Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Han S; Lee JY; Kim WJ; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(6):562-8. PubMed ID: 23787231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
