These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27867822)

  • 21. Recognition of Consumers' Characteristics of Purchasing Farm Produce with Safety Certificates and Their Influencing Factors.
    Wang J; Gao Z; Shen M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30558279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Systematic Narrative Review of the Evidence for Labeling of Natural Health Products and Dietary Supplements.
    Boon H; Bozinovski N
    J Altern Complement Med; 2019 Aug; 25(8):777-788. PubMed ID: 31013437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two front-of-package nutrition labeling schemes, and their explanation, on consumers' perception of product healthfulness and food choice.
    Lundeberg PJ; Graham DJ; Mohr GS
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():548-556. PubMed ID: 29496604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of Multi-Level Eco-Labels on the Product Evaluation of Meat and Meat Alternatives-A Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Kolber A; Meixner O
    Foods; 2023 Aug; 12(15):. PubMed ID: 37569210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An Exploratory Study of Consumers' Perceptions of Product Types and Factors Affecting Purchase Intentions in the Subscription Economy: 99 Subscription Business Cases.
    Baek H; Kim K
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2022 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35735389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors Influencing Consumer Purchase Intentions of Organically Grown Products in Shelly Centre, Port Shepstone, South Africa.
    Wekeza SV; Sibanda M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 30884921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A consumption value-gap analysis for sustainable consumption.
    Biswas A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar; 24(8):7714-7725. PubMed ID: 28124271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Desired and Undesired Effects of Energy Labels--An Eye-Tracking Study.
    Waechter S; Sütterlin B; Siegrist M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134132. PubMed ID: 26231028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Women's Cognition and Attitude with Eco-Friendly Menstrual Products by Consumer Lifestyle.
    Tu JC; Lo TY; Lai YT
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34064156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can the Part Replace the Whole? A Choice Experiment on Organic and Pesticide-Free Labels.
    Zheng Q; Wen X; Xiu X; Yang X; Chen Q
    Foods; 2022 Aug; 11(17):. PubMed ID: 36076749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does an energy efficiency label alter consumers' purchasing decisions? A latent class approach based on a stated choice experiment in Shanghai.
    Shen J; Saijo T
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3561-73. PubMed ID: 19595499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Impact of Disclosure of Nutrition Information on Consumers' Behavioral Intention in Korea.
    Choi J
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2015; 34(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 25826204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Role of Beliefs, Pride, and Perceived Barriers in Decision-Making Regarding Purchasing Value-Added Pulse Products among US Consumers.
    Kim SH; Kuo WY
    Foods; 2022 Mar; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 35327247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adult consumers' understanding and use of information on food labels: a study among consumers living in the Potchefstroom and Klerksdorp regions, South Africa.
    Jacobs SA; de Beer H; Larney M
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Mar; 14(3):510-22. PubMed ID: 20939940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surveys suck: Consumer preferences when purchasing genetically engineered foods.
    Powell DA
    GM Crops Food; 2013; 4(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 24281042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork.
    Verbeke W; Liu R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Dec; 98(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 25119515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consumers' purchase of organic food products. A matter of convenience and reflexive practices.
    Hjelmar U
    Appetite; 2011 Apr; 56(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 21192997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Moving towards sustainable purchase behavior: examining the determinants of consumers' intentions to adopt electric vehicles.
    Xu G; Wang S; Li J; Zhao D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jun; 27(18):22535-22546. PubMed ID: 32319053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nutrition labels in bar graph format deemed most useful for consumer purchase decisions using adaptive conjoint analysis.
    Geiger CJ; Wyse BW; Parent CR; Hansen RG
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1991 Jul; 91(7):800-7. PubMed ID: 2071795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predicting eco-conscious consumer behavior using theory of planned behavior in Pakistan.
    Hameed I; Waris I; Amin Ul Haq M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 May; 26(15):15535-15547. PubMed ID: 30945077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.