214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27868465)
1. Comparison of elastosonography and digital examination of cervix for consistency to predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labor with oxytocin.
Gultekin S; Gultekin IB; Icer B; Yilmaz E; Alkan A; Kucukozkan T
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(23):2795-2799. PubMed ID: 27868465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction.
Tanir HM; Sener T; Yildiz Z
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 17920604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography.
Pereira S; Frick AP; Poon LC; Zamprakou A; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 44(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 24832011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction.
Yanik A; Gülümser C; Tosun M
Adv Ther; 2007; 24(4):748-56. PubMed ID: 17901024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.
Park KH; Kim SN; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Jung HJ; Oh KJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21484904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Elastography in the examination of the uterine cervix before labor induction].
Preis K; Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 21117304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Gillor M; Vaisbuch E; Zaks S; Barak O; Hagay Z; Levy R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery.
Cubal A; Carvalho J; Ferreira MJ; Rodrigues G; Carmo OD
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix.
Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Scandroglio S; Colombo G; Bolis P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):41.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17240227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score.
Gonen R; Degani S; Ron A
Eur J Ultrasound; 1998 Aug; 7(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 9700213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
