These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
563 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27869333)
1. Patient-specific 3D FLAIR for enhanced visualization of brain white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis. Gabr RE; Pednekar AS; Govindarajan KA; Sun X; Riascos RF; Ramírez MG; Hasan KM; Lincoln JA; Nelson F; Wolinsky JS; Narayana PA J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):557-564. PubMed ID: 27869333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gray-matter-specific MR imaging improves the detection of epileptogenic zones in focal cortical dysplasia: A new sequence called fluid and white matter suppression (FLAWS). Chen X; Qian T; Kober T; Zhang G; Ren Z; Yu T; Piao Y; Chen N; Li K Neuroimage Clin; 2018; 20():388-397. PubMed ID: 30128277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal combination of FLAIR and T2-weighted MRI for improved lesion contrast in multiple sclerosis. Gabr RE; Hasan KM; Haque ME; Nelson FM; Wolinsky JS; Narayana PA J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1293-1300. PubMed ID: 27126898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single scan quantitative gradient recalled echo MRI for evaluation of tissue damage in lesions and normal appearing gray and white matter in multiple sclerosis. Xiang B; Wen J; Cross AH; Yablonskiy DA J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):487-498. PubMed ID: 30155934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Juxtacortical Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Assessment of Gray Matter Involvement Using Phase Difference-enhanced Imaging (PADRE). Futatsuya K; Kakeda S; Yoneda T; Ueda I; Watanabe K; Moriya J; Murakami Y; Ide S; Ogasawara A; Ohnari N; Okada K; Adachi H; Korogi Y Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 15(4):349-354. PubMed ID: 26841855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated detection of white matter and cortical lesions in early stages of multiple sclerosis. Fartaria MJ; Bonnier G; Roche A; Kober T; Meuli R; Rotzinger D; Frackowiak R; Schluep M; Du Pasquier R; Thiran JP; Krueger G; Bach Cuadra M; Granziera C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1445-54. PubMed ID: 26606758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of magnetization-prepared 3-dimensional fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging for lesion detection at 7 T. Saranathan M; Tourdias T; Kerr AB; Bernstein JD; Kerchner GA; Han MH; Rutt BK Invest Radiol; 2014 May; 49(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 24566291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated patient-specific optimization of three-dimensional double-inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging. Gabr RE; Sun X; Pednekar AS; Narayana PA Magn Reson Med; 2016 Feb; 75(2):585-93. PubMed ID: 25761973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of Improvement of Tissue Contrast and Reduction of Imaging Time by Shortening TR in Brain T Ikeguchi H; Shonai T; Watanabe T; Nawate M; Yano R Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(12):1256-1265. PubMed ID: 33342944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted fast spin-echo contrast-enhanced imaging: a comparison in 20 patients with brain lesions. Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Athyal RP; Rudwan M; Khafajee S J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 19695043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of combined T Fujiwara Y; Inoue Y; Kanamoto M; Ishida S; Adachi T; Kimura H Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Mar; 12(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 30666614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are multi-contrast magnetic resonance images necessary for segmenting multiple sclerosis brains? A large cohort study based on deep learning. Narayana PA; Coronado I; Sujit SJ; Sun X; Wolinsky JS; Gabr RE Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 65():8-14. PubMed ID: 31670238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FLAIR*: a combined MR contrast technique for visualizing white matter lesions and parenchymal veins. Sati P; George IC; Shea CD; Gaitán MI; Reich DS Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):926-32. PubMed ID: 23074257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between synthetic and conventional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis and controls. Di Giuliano F; Minosse S; Picchi E; Marfia GA; Da Ros V; Muto M; Muto M; Pistolese CA; Laghi A; Garaci F; Floris R MAGMA; 2020 Aug; 33(4):549-557. PubMed ID: 31782035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical application of multi-contrast 7-T MR imaging in multiple sclerosis: increased lesion detection compared to 3 T confined to grey matter. de Graaf WL; Kilsdonk ID; Lopez-Soriano A; Zwanenburg JJ; Visser F; Polman CH; Castelijns JA; Geurts JJ; Pouwels PJ; Luijten PR; Barkhof F; Wattjes MP Eur Radiol; 2013 Feb; 23(2):528-40. PubMed ID: 22898935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing lesion detection of infratentorial multiple sclerosis lesions between T2-weighted spin-echo, 2D-FLAIR, and 3D-FLAIR sequences. Wang KY; Uribe TA; Lincoln CM Clin Imaging; 2018; 51():229-234. PubMed ID: 29879598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitfalls of 3D FLAIR brain imaging: a prospective comparison with 2D FLAIR. Kakeda S; Korogi Y; Hiai Y; Ohnari N; Sato T; Hirai T Acad Radiol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):1225-32. PubMed ID: 22818791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]