134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27869363)
21. Validation of a nomogram for predicting survival after resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
de Castro SM; Biere SS; Lagarde SM; Busch OR; van Gulik TM; Gouma DJ
Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 19283741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. External validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center preoperative nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in a cohort of high-grade prostate cancer patients.
Touma N; Larose M; Ouellet J; Bédard-Tremblay D; Singbo N; Hovington H; Neveu B; Archambault L; Pouliot F
Prostate; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38800871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does Albumin Level Change the Strength of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Nomogram Used to Predict 5-year Survival in Patients with Colon Cancer?
Kubat M; Bozkirli BO; Yazicioglu MO; Gundogdu RH
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2022 Apr; 32(4):467-472. PubMed ID: 35330519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy and histopathologic response in primary, high-grade retroperitoneal sarcomas using the sarcoma nomogram.
Donahue TR; Kattan MW; Nelson SD; Tap WD; Eilber FR; Eilber FC
Cancer; 2010 Aug; 116(16):3883-91. PubMed ID: 20564145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development and external validation of two nomograms to predict overall survival and occurrence of distant metastases in adults after surgical resection of localised soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a retrospective analysis.
Callegaro D; Miceli R; Bonvalot S; Ferguson P; Strauss DC; Levy A; Griffin A; Hayes AJ; Stacchiotti S; Pechoux CL; Smith MJ; Fiore M; Dei Tos AP; Smith HG; Mariani L; Wunder JS; Pollock RE; Casali PG; Gronchi A
Lancet Oncol; 2016 May; 17(5):671-80. PubMed ID: 27068860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk stratification systems for surgically treated localized primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST). Review of literature and comparison of the three prognostic criteria: MSKCC Nomogramm, NIH-Fletcher and AFIP-Miettinen.
Belfiori G; Sartelli M; Cardinali L; Tranà C; Bracci R; Gesuita R; Marmorale C
Ann Ital Chir; 2015; 86(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 26098671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative validation of online nomograms for predicting nonsentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer.
Hessman CJ; Naik AM; Kearney NM; Jensen AJ; Diggs BS; Troxell ML; Vetto JT
Arch Surg; 2011 Sep; 146(9):1035-40. PubMed ID: 21931000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A multi-institutional validation study of prognostic nomograms for retroperitoneal sarcoma.
Squires MH; Ethun CG; Donahue EE; Benbow JH; Anderson CJ; Jagosky MH; Salo JC; Hill JS; Ahrens W; Prabhu RS; Livingston MB; Gower NL; Needham M; Trufan SJ; Fields RC; Krasnick BA; Bedi M; Abbott DE; Schwartz P; Votanopoulos K; Chouliaras K; Grignol V; Roggin KK; Tseng J; Poultsides G; Tran TB; Cardona K; Howard JH
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 124(5):829-837. PubMed ID: 34254691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram to predict disease-specific survival in a Chinese gastric cancer population receiving postoperative chemoradiotherapy after an R0 resection.
Zhou ML; Wang L; Wang JZ; Yang W; Hu R; Li GC; Sheng WQ; Zhang Z
Oncotarget; 2016 Oct; 7(40):64757-64765. PubMed ID: 27588465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of nomograms for prognostication of patients with primary soft tissue sarcomas of the trunk and extremity: report from the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan.
Sekimizu M; Ogura K; Yasunaga H; Matsui H; Tanaka S; Inagaki K; Kawai A
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jul; 19(1):657. PubMed ID: 31272407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Survival after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma-development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram.
Groot Koerkamp B; Wiggers JK; Gonen M; Doussot A; Allen PJ; Besselink MGH; Blumgart LH; Busch ORC; D'Angelica MI; DeMatteo RP; Gouma DJ; Kingham TP; van Gulik TM; Jarnagin WR
Ann Oncol; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1930-1935. PubMed ID: 26133967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after local excision.
Yi M; Meric-Bernstam F; Kuerer HM; Mittendorf EA; Bedrosian I; Lucci A; Hwang RF; Crow JR; Luo S; Hunt KK
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Feb; 30(6):600-7. PubMed ID: 22253459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improved Risk Prediction Calculator for Sentinel Node Positivity in Patients With Melanoma: The Melanoma Institute Australia Nomogram.
Lo SN; Ma J; Scolyer RA; Haydu LE; Stretch JR; Saw RPM; Nieweg OE; Shannon KF; Spillane AJ; Ch'ng S; Mann GJ; Gershenwald JE; Thompson JF; Varey AHR
J Clin Oncol; 2020 Aug; 38(24):2719-2727. PubMed ID: 32530761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. External validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre and Briganti nomograms for the prediction of lymph node involvement of prostate cancer using clinical stage assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
Soeterik TFW; Hueting TA; Israel B; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Stomps S; Biesma DH; Koffijberg H; Sedelaar M; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
BJU Int; 2021 Aug; 128(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 33630398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. One-Stop-Shop Whole-Body
Thalgott M; Düwel C; Rauscher I; Heck MM; Haller B; Gafita A; Gschwend JE; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 29794224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of Preoperative Treatment on the Performance of Predictive Nomograms in Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.
Ng D; Cyr DP; Burtenshaw SM; Callegaro D; Gronchi A; Shultz D; Brar S; Chung P; Gladdy RA; Catton C; Swallow CJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 29(4):2304-2314. PubMed ID: 35022902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Low performance of the MSKCC nomogram in preoperatively ultrasonically negative axillary lymph node in breast cancer patients.
Zgajnar J; Perhavec A; Hocevar M; Podkrajsek M; Hertl K; Frkovic-Grazio S; Pohar M; Besic N
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 96(7):547-53. PubMed ID: 17708546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of three models to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective study of 77 patients].
Terrier C; Tariel O; Coutant C; De Saint Hilaire P; Devouassoux M; Rudigoz RC; Dubernard G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 May; 41(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 22464015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Nomogram to predict the risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Japanese breast cancer patients.
Sasada T; Murakami S; Kataoka T; Ohara M; Ozaki S; Okada M; Ohdan H
Surg Today; 2012 Feb; 42(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 22167482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis and validation study of the MSKCC nomogram in breast cancer patients.
Qiu PF; Liu JJ; Wang YS; Yang GR; Liu YB; Sun X; Wang CJ; Zhang ZP
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1002-7. PubMed ID: 23100610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
