BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27869364)

  • 1. Assessing the reliability of ecotoxicological studies: An overview of current needs and approaches.
    Moermond C; Beasley A; Breton R; Junghans M; Laskowski R; Solomon K; Zahner H
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):640-651. PubMed ID: 27869364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New approach to weight-of-evidence assessment of ecotoxicological effects in regulatory decision-making.
    Hall AT; Belanger SE; Guiney PD; Galay-Burgos M; Maack G; Stubblefield W; Martin O
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):573-579. PubMed ID: 28383801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory decision making.
    Rudén C; Adams J; Ågerstrand M; Brock TC; Poulsen V; Schlekat CE; Wheeler JR; Henry TR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):652-663. PubMed ID: 27599457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population-relevant endpoints in the evaluation of endocrine-active substances (EAS) for ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment.
    Marty MS; Blankinship A; Chambers J; Constantine L; Kloas W; Kumar A; Lagadic L; Meador J; Pickford D; Schwarz T; Verslycke T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):317-330. PubMed ID: 28052490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current limitations and recommendations to improve testing for the environmental assessment of endocrine active substances.
    Coady KK; Biever RC; Denslow ND; Gross M; Guiney PD; Holbech H; Karouna-Renier NK; Katsiadaki I; Krueger H; Levine SL; Maack G; Williams M; Wolf JC; Ankley GT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):302-316. PubMed ID: 27791330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations.
    Arnold SM; Greggs B; Goyak KO; Landenberger BD; Mason AM; Howard B; Zaleski RT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1007-1022. PubMed ID: 28294522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment of endocrine active substances.
    Leopold A; Roberts M; Matthiessen P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):264-266. PubMed ID: 27862919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting and evaluation criteria as means towards a transparent use of ecotoxicity data for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals.
    Ågerstrand M; Küster A; Bachmann J; Breitholtz M; Ebert I; Rechenberg B; Rudén C
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Oct; 159(10):2487-92. PubMed ID: 21763042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recommended approaches to the scientific evaluation of ecotoxicological hazards and risks of endocrine-active substances.
    Matthiessen P; Ankley GT; Biever RC; Bjerregaard P; Borgert C; Brugger K; Blankinship A; Chambers J; Coady KK; Constantine L; Dang Z; Denslow ND; Dreier DA; Dungey S; Gray LE; Gross M; Guiney PD; Hecker M; Holbech H; Iguchi T; Kadlec S; Karouna-Renier NK; Katsiadaki I; Kawashima Y; Kloas W; Krueger H; Kumar A; Lagadic L; Leopold A; Levine SL; Maack G; Marty S; Meador J; Mihaich E; Odum J; Ortego L; Parrott J; Pickford D; Roberts M; Schaefers C; Schwarz T; Solomon K; Verslycke T; Weltje L; Wheeler JR; Williams M; Wolf JC; Yamazaki K
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):267-279. PubMed ID: 28127947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What training and skills will the ecotoxicologists of the future require?
    Harris MJ; Huggett DB; Staveley JP; Sumpter JP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):580-584. PubMed ID: 27935241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporation of sediment- and soil-specific aspects in the Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data (CRED).
    Casado-Martinez M; Dell'Ambrogio G; Campiche S; Kroll A; Lauber E; Marti-Roura M; Mendez-Fernandez L; Renaud M; Tierbach A; Wildi M; Wong JWY; Werner I; Junghans M; Ferrari BJD
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38780110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for shampoos: The basis for comparable life cycle assessment.
    Golsteijn L; Lessard L; Campion JF; Capelli A; D'Enfert V; King H; Kremer J; Krugman M; Orliac H; Furnemont SR; Schuh W; Stalmans M; O'Hanlon NW; Coroama M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):649-659. PubMed ID: 29870121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A risk-based, product-level approach for assuring aquatic environmental safety of cleaning products in the context of sustainability: The Environmental Safety Check (ESC) scheme of the A.I.S.E. Charter for Sustainable Cleaning.
    Pickup JA; Dewaele J; Furmanski NL; Kowalczyk A; Luijkx GC; Mathieu S; Stelter N
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):127-138. PubMed ID: 26891423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coral Ecotoxicological Data Evaluation for the Environmental Safety Assessment of Ultraviolet Filters.
    Burns EE; Davies IA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Dec; 40(12):3441-3464. PubMed ID: 34758162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An introduction to Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Exposure Datasets (CREED) for use in environmental assessments.
    Merrington G; Nowell LH; Peck C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 Jul; 20(4):975-980. PubMed ID: 38329199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using REACH for the EU Environmental Footprint: Building a Usable Ecotoxicity Database, Part I.
    Saouter E; Biganzoli F; Pant R; Sala S; Versteeg D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Sep; 15(5):783-795. PubMed ID: 31116000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
    Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical review of the OSPAR risk-based approach for offshore-produced water discharges.
    Nielsen AF; Baun A; Andersen SI; Skjolding LM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2023 Sep; 19(5):1172-1187. PubMed ID: 36461708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomy of a decision II: Potential effects of changes to Tier I chemical approaches in Canadian Disposal at Sea program sediment assessment protocols.
    Apitz SE; Agius S
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1072-1085. PubMed ID: 28600872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the reliability of environmental concentration data to characterize exposure in environmental risk assessments.
    Hladik ML; Markus A; Helsel D; Nowell LH; Polesello S; Rüdel H; Szabo D; Wilson I
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 Jul; 20(4):981-1003. PubMed ID: 38305083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.