245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27869481)
1. Papillary vs Nonpapillary Puncture in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Kallidonis P; Kyriazis I; Kotsiris D; Koutava A; Kamal W; Liatsikos E
J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(S1):S4-S9. PubMed ID: 27869481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Challenging the wisdom of puncture at the calyceal fornix in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: feasibility and safety study with 137 patients operated via a non-calyceal percutaneous track.
Kyriazis I; Kallidonis P; Vasilas M; Panagopoulos V; Kamal W; Liatsikos E
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):795-801. PubMed ID: 27510761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Papillary vs non-papillary access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Retrospective, match-paired case-control study.
Tahra A; Sobay R; Bindayi A; Suceken FY; Kucuk EV
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Apr; 92(1):50-52. PubMed ID: 32255322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shockwave lithotripsy necessary?
Wong C; Leveillee RJ
J Endourol; 2002 Sep; 16(7):477-81. PubMed ID: 12396440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective randomized comparison between superior calyceal access versus inferior calyceal access in PCNL for inferior calyceal stones with or without pelvic stones.
Singh V; Garg Y; Sharma K; Sinha RJ; Gupta S
Urolithiasis; 2016 Apr; 44(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 26188918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial.
Moosanejad N; Firouzian A; Hashemi SA; Bahari M; Fazli M
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2016; 49(4):e4878. PubMed ID: 27007650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience.
Sakr A; Salem E; Kamel M; Desoky E; Ragab A; Omran M; Fawzi A; Shahin A
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):585-589. PubMed ID: 28229197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluoroscopy versus ultrasonography guided mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
Sun H; Zhang Z; Huang G; Wan SP; Chen H; He B; Yuan J; Liu Y
Urolithiasis; 2017 Jun; 45(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 27376719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial.
Basiri A; Tabibi A; Nouralizadeh A; Arab D; Rezaeetalab GH; Hosseini Sharifi SH; Soltani MH
Urol J; 2014 Nov; 11(6):1932-7. PubMed ID: 25433470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis.
Isac W; Rizkala E; Liu X; Noble M; Monga M
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 23374772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The best calyceal tract approach for treating renal stones with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Chanprasopon P; Kongchareonsombat W; Leenanupunth C; Kijvikai K; Viseshsindh W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 May; 96(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 23745313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of microperc and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for medium-sized lower calyx stones.
Tok A; Akbulut F; Buldu I; Karatag T; Kucuktopcu O; Gurbuz G; Istanbulluoglu O; Armagan A; Tepeler A; Tasci AI
Urolithiasis; 2016 Apr; 44(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 26194110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized controlled trial comparing retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study.
Li S; Liu TZ; Wang XH; Zeng XT; Zeng G; Yang ZH; Weng H; Meng Z; Huang JY
J Endourol; 2014 Aug; 28(8):946-50. PubMed ID: 24708300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for caliceal diverticular calculi: a novel single stage approach.
Kim SC; Kuo RL; Tinmouth WW; Watkins S; Lingeman JE
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1194-8. PubMed ID: 15758742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study.
Kukreja R; Desai M; Patel S; Bapat S; Desai M
J Endourol; 2004 Oct; 18(8):715-22. PubMed ID: 15659890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal calculi: is multi-tract approach ok?
Cho HJ; Lee JY; Kim SW; Hwang TK; Hong SH
Can J Urol; 2012 Aug; 19(4):6360-5. PubMed ID: 22892259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of large renal stones in single- versus double-functioning kidney patients.
Basiri A; Shabaninia S; Mir A; Soltani MH
J Endourol; 2012 Mar; 26(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 22050500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger Than 10 mm: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Lee JW; Park J; Lee SB; Son H; Cho SY; Jeong H
Urology; 2015 Nov; 86(5):873-7. PubMed ID: 26320082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of Amplatz dilators and metal dilators for tract dilatation in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Arslan B; Akbulut MF; Onuk O; Küçüktopçu O; Çilesiz NC; Ozkan A; Yazıcı G
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):581-585. PubMed ID: 28116640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole renal stone using subcostal access.
Aghamir SM; Modaresi SS; Aloosh M; Tajik A
J Endourol; 2011 Apr; 25(4):583-6. PubMed ID: 21381953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
