162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27870290)
1. Assessment of USDA-NRCS rangeland conservation programs: recommendation for an evidence-based conservation platform.
Briske DD; Bestelmeyer BT; Brown JR; Brunson MW; Thurow TL; Tanaka JA
Ecol Appl; 2017 Jan; 27(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 27870290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The case and opportunity for public-supported financial incentives to implement integrated pest management.
Brewer MJ; Hoard RJ; Landis JN; Elworth LE
J Econ Entomol; 2004 Dec; 97(6):1782-9. PubMed ID: 15666728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A stream visual assessment protocol (SVAP) for riparian landowners.
Bjorkland R; Pringle CM; Newton B
Environ Monit Assess; 2001 May; 68(2):99-125. PubMed ID: 11411146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.
Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Larkin JL
Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 30535797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Financial barriers and opportunities for conservation adoption on U.S. rangelands: A region-wide, ranch-level economic assessment of NRCS-sponsored Greater Sage-grouse habitat conservation programs.
Maher AT; Quintana Ashwell NE; Tanaka JA; Ritten JP; Maczko KA
J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 329():116420. PubMed ID: 36639312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-paddock grazing on rangelands: why the perceptual dichotomy between research results and rancher experience?
Teague R; Provenza F; Kreuter U; Steffens T; Barnes M
J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():699-717. PubMed ID: 23850765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The challenge of documenting water quality benefits of conservation practices: a review of USDA-ARS's conservation effects assessment project watershed studies.
Tomer MD; Locke MA
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(1):300-10. PubMed ID: 22053489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Riverine threat indices to assess watershed condition and identify primary management capacity of agriculture natural resource management agencies.
Fore JD; Sowa SP; Galat DL; Annis GM; Diamond DD; Rewa C
Environ Manage; 2014 Mar; 53(3):567-82. PubMed ID: 24390081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consider the source: the impact of media and authority in outreach to private forest and rangeland owners.
Ferranto S; Huntsinger L; Stewart W; Getz C; Nakamura G; Kelly M
J Environ Manage; 2012 Apr; 97():131-40. PubMed ID: 22266415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advancing the Sustainability of US Agriculture through Long-Term Research.
Kleinman PJA; Spiegal S; Rigby JR; Goslee SC; Baker JM; Bestelmeyer BT; Boughton RK; Bryant RB; Cavigelli MA; Derner JD; Duncan EW; Goodrich DC; Huggins DR; King KW; Liebig MA; Locke MA; Mirsky SB; Moglen GE; Moorman TB; Pierson FB; Robertson GP; Sadler EJ; Shortle JS; Steiner JL; Strickland TC; Swain HM; Tsegaye T; Williams MR; Walthall CL
J Environ Qual; 2018 Nov; 47(6):1412-1425. PubMed ID: 30512071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Impact of Federal and State Conservation Programs on Farmer Nitrogen Management.
Reimer AP; Denny RCH; Stuart D
Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 62(4):694-708. PubMed ID: 30032320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the relation of USDA conservation expenditures to suspended sediment reductions in an Iowa watershed.
Villarini G; Schilling KE; Jones CS
J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 180():375-83. PubMed ID: 27262032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Science and agriculture policy at Land-Grant Institutions.
Westendorf ML; Zimbelman RG; Pray CE
J Anim Sci; 1995 Jun; 73(6):1628-38. PubMed ID: 7673056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Institutional, individual, and socio-cultural domains of partnerships: a typology of USDA Forest Service recreation partners.
Seekamp E; Cerveny LK; McCreary A
Environ Manage; 2011 Sep; 48(3):615-30. PubMed ID: 21710222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of USDA Forest Service and Stakeholder Motivations and Experiences in Collaborative Federal Forest Governance in the Western United States.
Davis EJ; White EM; Cerveny LK; Seesholtz D; Nuss ML; Ulrich DR
Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):908-921. PubMed ID: 28815317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation.
Sorice MG; Oh CO; Gartner T; Snieckus M; Johnson R; Donlan CJ
Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1146-55. PubMed ID: 23967582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
