224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27870553)
1. Comparison of Two Intraosseous Devices: The NIO Versus the EZ-IO by Novice Users-A Randomized Cross Over Trial.
Shina A; Baruch EN; Shlaifer A; Shovali A; Levi M; Yosefy O; Segal D; Bader T; Shavit I; Yitzhak A
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2017; 21(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 27870553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial.
Bielski K; Szarpak L; Smereka J; Ladny JR; Leung S; Ruetzler K
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 176(7):865-871. PubMed ID: 28500463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous Infusion Systems for Adult Emergencies, the CITRIN (Comparison of InTRaosseous infusion systems in emergency medicINe)-Study.
Hammer N; Möbius R; Gries A; Hossfeld B; Bechmann I; Bernhard M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143726. PubMed ID: 26630579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Military Medic Performance with Employment of a Commercial Intraosseous Infusion Device: A Randomized, Crossover Study.
Gendron B; Cronin A; Monti J; Brigg A
Mil Med; 2018 May; 183(5-6):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 29420766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two mechanical intraosseous infusion devices: a pilot, randomized crossover trial.
Shavit I; Hoffmann Y; Galbraith R; Waisman Y
Resuscitation; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1029-33. PubMed ID: 19586701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the NIO and T.A.L.O.N Intraosseous Devices as Placed by U.S. Army Conventional Force Combat Medics-A Randomized Crossover Study.
Lange P; Umar M; Walker JD; Riddle M; Mochmer P
Mil Med; 2022 Jul; 187(7-8):e877-e881. PubMed ID: 34327538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intravascular access methods applied by nurses wearing personal protective equipment in simulated COVID-19 resuscitation: A randomized crossover simulation trial.
Drozd A; Smereka J; Pruc M; Malysz M; Gasecka A; Sonmez LO; Cyran M; Konge L; Szarpak L
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Nov; 49():189-194. PubMed ID: 34126564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Randomized Cadaver Study Comparing First-Attempt Success Between Tibial and Humeral Intraosseous Insertions Using NIO Device by Paramedics: A Preliminary Investigation.
Szarpak L; Truszewski Z; Smereka J; Krajewski P; Fudalej M; Adamczyk P; Czyzewski L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(20):e3724. PubMed ID: 27196493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consecutive field trials using two different intraosseous devices.
Frascone RJ; Jensen JP; Kaye K; Salzman JG
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 17454802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: A prospective study and review of the literature.
Santos D; Carron PN; Yersin B; Pasquier M
Resuscitation; 2013 Apr; 84(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23160104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two different intraosseous access methods in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service - a quality assurance study.
Sørgjerd R; Sunde GA; Heltne JK
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 27(1):15. PubMed ID: 30760297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three intraosseous access devices for resuscitation of term neonates: a randomised simulation study.
Keller A; Boukai A; Feldman O; Diamand R; Shavit I
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2022 May; 107(3):289-292. PubMed ID: 34340986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two intraosseous infusion systems for adult emergency medical use.
Brenner T; Bernhard M; Helm M; Doll S; Völkl A; Ganion N; Friedmann C; Sikinger M; Knapp J; Martin E; Gries A
Resuscitation; 2008 Sep; 78(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 18573590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized study.
Leidel BA; Kirchhoff C; Braunstein V; Bogner V; Biberthaler P; Kanz KG
Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):994-9. PubMed ID: 20434823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomical investigations on intraosseous access in stillborns - Comparison of different devices and techniques.
Fuchs Z; Scaal M; Haverkamp H; Koerber F; Persigehl T; Eifinger F
Resuscitation; 2018 Jun; 127():79-82. PubMed ID: 29627398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 4 Pediatric Intraosseous Access Devices: A Randomized Simulation Study.
Szarpak L; Ladny JR; Dabrowski M; Ladny M; Smereka J; Ahuja S; Ruetzler K
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2020 Oct; 36(10):e568-e572. PubMed ID: 30106870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraosseous access EZ-IO in a prehospital emergency service.
Torres F; Galán MD; Alonso Mdel M; Suárez R; Camacho C; Almagro V
J Emerg Nurs; 2013 Sep; 39(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 23099011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two intraosseous devices in adult patients in the emergency setting: a pilot study.
Demir OF; Aydin K; Akay H; Erbil B; Karcioglu O; Gulalp B
Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 23(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 25075979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An observational, prospective study to determine the ease of vascular access in adults using a novel intraosseous access device.
Ong ME; Ngo AS; Wijaya R
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2009 Feb; 38(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 19271038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service.
Helm M; Haunstein B; Schlechtriemen T; Ruppert M; Lampl L; Gäßler M
Resuscitation; 2015 Mar; 88():43-7. PubMed ID: 25553609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
