283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27870656)
1. Oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Duncombe SL; Voss C; Harris KC
J Hypertens; 2017 Feb; 35(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 27870656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park SH; Park YS
Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of resting blood pressure measurement and classification using an oscillometric device in children with chronic kidney disease.
Flynn JT; Pierce CB; Miller ER; Charleston J; Samuels JA; Kupferman J; Furth SL; Warady BA;
J Pediatr; 2012 Mar; 160(3):434-440.e1. PubMed ID: 22048052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.
Eliasdottir SB; Steinthorsdottir SD; Indridason OS; Palsson R; Edvardsson VO
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 Nov; 15(11):776-83. PubMed ID: 24112661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the accuracy and errors of blood pressure measured by 2 types of non-mercury sphygmomanometers in an epidemiological survey.
Choi S; Kim YM; Shin J; Lim YH; Choi SY; Choi BY; Oh KW; Lee HM; Woo KJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e10851. PubMed ID: 29923975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternatives to the mercury sphygmomanometer.
Buchanan S; Orris P; Karliner J
J Public Health Policy; 2011 Feb; 32(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 21109765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of automated blood pressure measurements in the presence of atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clark CE; McDonagh STJ; McManus RJ
J Hum Hypertens; 2019 May; 33(5):352-364. PubMed ID: 30631126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is one measurement enough to evaluate blood pressure among adolescents? A blood pressure screening experience in more than 9000 children with a subset comparison of auscultatory to mercury measurements.
Negroni-Balasquide X; Bell CS; Samuel J; Samuels JA
J Am Soc Hypertens; 2016 Feb; 10(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 26875474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values.
Adler C; Ellert U; Neuhauser HK
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 24583967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
