These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27870697)

  • 1. Functional Movement Screen Factorial Validity and Measurement Invariance Across Sex Among Collegiate Student-Athletes.
    Gnacinski SL; Cornell DJ; Meyer BB; Arvinen-Barrow M; Earl-Boehm JE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Dec; 30(12):3388-3395. PubMed ID: 27870697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Perceived Susceptibility to Sport Injury scale.
    Gnacinski SL; Arvinen-Barrow M; Brewer BW; Meyer BB
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2017 Jul; 27(7):754-761. PubMed ID: 27037676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Functional Movement Screen as a Predictor of Injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II Athletes.
    Dorrel B; Long T; Shaffer S; Myer GD
    J Athl Train; 2018 Jan; 53(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 29251533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance Comparison of Student-Athletes and General College Students on the Functional Movement Screen and the Y Balance Test.
    Engquist KD; Smith CA; Chimera NJ; Warren M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2296-303. PubMed ID: 26203739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting Musculoskeletal Injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II Athletes From Asymmetries and Individual-Test Versus Composite Functional Movement Screen Scores.
    Mokha M; Sprague PA; Gatens DR
    J Athl Train; 2016 Apr; 51(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 26794630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen and a Novel Basketball Mobility Test as an Injury Prediction Tool for Collegiate Basketball Players.
    Bond CW; Dorman JC; Odney TO; Roggenbuck SJ; Young SW; Munce TA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jun; 33(6):1589-1600. PubMed ID: 28426513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Injury history, sex, and performance on the functional movement screen and Y balance test.
    Chimera NJ; Smith CA; Warren M
    J Athl Train; 2015 May; 50(5):475-85. PubMed ID: 25761134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining the Relationship Between the Functional Movement Screen and the Landing Error Scoring System in an Active, Male Collegiate Population.
    Everard EM; Harrison AJ; Lyons M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 May; 31(5):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 27465626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional movement screen differences between male and female secondary school athletes.
    Anderson BE; Neumann ML; Huxel Bliven KC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Apr; 29(4):1098-106. PubMed ID: 25330082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Little associations exist between the three commonly used functional screening tests in collegiate athletes.
    Asgari M; Alizadeh MH; Naderi M; Abshenas E; Sahebozamani M; Yazdani S; Nolte K; Alizadeh S; Mohammadi M; Kooroshfard N; Arghadeh R; Jaitner T
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):13611. PubMed ID: 38871829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional Movement Screening Performance of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Athletes From Brazil: Differences Considering Practice Time and Combat Style.
    Del Vecchio FB; Gondim DF; Arruda AC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Aug; 30(8):2341-7. PubMed ID: 26808855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ).
    Grugan MC; Olsson LF; Vaughan RS; Madigan DJ; Hill AP
    Psychol Sport Exerc; 2024 Jul; 73():102638. PubMed ID: 38583793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factor structure of the functional movement screen in marine officer candidates.
    Kazman JB; Galecki JM; Lisman P; Deuster PA; OʼConnor FG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Mar; 28(3):672-8. PubMed ID: 23924891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in functional movement screen scores over a season in collegiate soccer and volleyball athletes.
    Sprague PA; Mokha GM; Gatens DR
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Nov; 28(11):3155-63. PubMed ID: 24796980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Athlete Sleep Behavior Questionnaire.
    Miley EN; Hansberger BL; Casanova M; Baker RT; Pickering MA
    J Athl Train; 2023 Mar; 58(3):261-270. PubMed ID: 34623429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preseason Functional Movement Screen Predicts Risk of Time-Loss Injury in Experienced Male Rugby Union Athletes.
    Duke SR; Martin SE; Gaul CA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Oct; 31(10):2740-2747. PubMed ID: 28195971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional Movement Screen scores in a group of division IA athletes.
    Miller JM; Susa KJ
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2019 May; 59(5):779-783. PubMed ID: 29745218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and factorial invariance of the Social Physique Anxiety Scale.
    Motl RW; Conroy DE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 May; 32(5):1007-17. PubMed ID: 10795794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the psychometric properties of cognitive fusion questionnaire. A study of the factorial validity and factorial invariance of the measure among osteoarticular disease, diabetes mellitus, obesity, depressive disorder, and general populations.
    Costa JA; Marôco J; Pinto-Gouveia J
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2017 Sep; 24(5):1121-1129. PubMed ID: 28198068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musculoskeletal Screening to Identify Female Collegiate Rowers at Risk for Low Back Pain.
    Gonzalez SL; Diaz AM; Plummer HA; Michener LA
    J Athl Train; 2018 Dec; 53(12):1173-1180. PubMed ID: 30525938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.