147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27871201)
1. First-trimester reference centiles of fetal biometry in Indian population.
Kumar M; Vajala R; Sharma K; Singh S; Singh R; Gupta U; Bhattacharjee J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(23):2804-2811. PubMed ID: 27871201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reference centile charts of first-trimester aneuploidy screening & Doppler parameters for Indian population.
Kumar M; Singh S; Sharma K; Singh R; Ravi V; Gupta U; Bhattacharjee J
Indian J Med Res; 2018 Oct; 148(4):427-434. PubMed ID: 30666005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Dorion A; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 12858306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters.
Verburg BO; Mulder PG; Hofman A; Jaddoe VW; Witteman JC; Steegers EA
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Apr; 28(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 18324617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
von Kaisenberg CS; Fritzer E; Kühling H; Jonat W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):564-74. PubMed ID: 12493045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practical biometric ratios of first-trimester screening.
Ergin RN; Yayla M; Ergin AS
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2013; 40(1):106-8. PubMed ID: 23724520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First-Trimester Abdominal Circumference (Versus Crown Rump Length) Improves Precision in Inter- and Intraobserver Variability.
Afshar Y; Gutkin R; Krakow D; Cuckle H; Silverman NS; Platt LD
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2161-2167. PubMed ID: 30593696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between first trimester visualization of the intracranial translucency and spina bifida.
Yuksel MA; Arisoy R; Erdogdu E; Imamoglu M; Yayla M; Sen C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Mar; 291(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 25135380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reference charts and equations of fetal biometry for normal singleton pregnant women in Shaanxi, China.
Jiang X; Zhang YH; Li Y; Ma X; Zhu YS; Shang L
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2013; 40(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 24283173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First-trimester screening for fetal triploidy at 11 to 14 weeks: a role for fetal biometry.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Nizard J; Ville Y
Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jun; 25(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 15966039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nuchal translucency in normal fetus and its variation with increasing crown rump length (CRL) and gestational age.
Karki S; Joshi KS; Tamrakar SR; Regmi S; Khanal K
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2013; 11(44):282-6. PubMed ID: 24899320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Crown-Rump Length Discordance, Increased Nuchal Translucency, and Detection of Fetal Structural Anomalies in Twin Pregnancies in the First Trimester: 5 Years of Experience in a Tertiary Hospital in China.
Li X; Xuan Y; Wang J; Wang L; Papageorghiou AT; Wu Q
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Apr; 41(4):971-982. PubMed ID: 34289155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do Early Fetal Measurements and Nuchal Translucency Correlate With Term Birth Weight?
Hackmon R; Librach C; Burwick R; Rodrigues N; Farine D; Berger H
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Sep; 39(9):750-756. PubMed ID: 28733063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Distribution and normal reference range of fetal nuchal translucency thickness in Kunming pregnant women in the first trimester].
Sun Q; Xu J; Hu SQ; Chen M; Ma RM; Lau TK; Zhang L; Xiao X; Qian Y; Guo Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 47(7):514-7. PubMed ID: 23141162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.
Žaliūnas B; Jakaitė V; Kurmanavičius J; Bartkevičienė D; Norvilaitė K; Passerini K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 306(5):1503-1517. PubMed ID: 35220480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Study of accuracy of commonly used fetal parameters for estimation of gestational age.
Karki DB; Sharmqa UK; Rauniyar RK
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006; 45(162):233-7. PubMed ID: 17189967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distribution of normal nuchal translucency thickness: a multicenter study in Thailand.
Kor-Anantakul O; Suntharasaj T; Suwanrath C; Chanprapaph P; Sirichotiyakul S; Ratanasiri T; Vuthiwong C; Geater A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 71(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 21150163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distribution of nuchal translucency thickness at 11 to 14 weeks of gestation in a normal Turkish population.
Dinç G; Eyüboğlu İ
Turk J Med Sci; 2021 Feb; 51(1):90-94. PubMed ID: 32777901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated ultrasonographic measurement of basic fetal growth parameters.
Pashaj S; Merz E; Petrela E
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 23129519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
