These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27871703)

  • 1. Change in the vertical dimension of Class II Division 1 patients after use of cervical or high-pull headgear.
    Zervas ED; Galang-Boquiren MT; Obrez A; Costa Viana MG; Oppermann N; Sanchez F; Romero EG; Kusnoto B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):771-781. PubMed ID: 27871703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of cervical headgear and lower utility arch in the control of the vertical dimension.
    Ulger G; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Isik F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17045149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical changes in high-angle Class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear.
    Burke M; Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Dec; 102(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 1456230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Bilbo EE; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Allareddy V; Holton N; Thames AM; Otsby MS; Southard TE
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Sep; 88(5):530-537. PubMed ID: 29667470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report.
    Shah AH
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear.
    Lima Filho RM; Lima AL; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 12725376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion.
    Miguel JAM; Masucci C; Fernandes LQP; Artese F; Franchi L; Giuntini V
    Prog Orthod; 2020 May; 21(1):11. PubMed ID: 32363550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
    Gkantidis N; Halazonetis DJ; Alexandropoulos E; Haralabakis NB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21889079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric changes in growing patients with increased vertical dimension treated with cervical headgear.
    Sambataro S; Fastuca R; Oppermann NJ; Lorusso P; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Caprioglio A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Jul; 78(4):312-320. PubMed ID: 28455746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.