These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27871703)

  • 21. [Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion].
    Miguel JAM; Masucci C; Fernandes LQP; Artese F; Franchi L; Giuntini V
    Orthod Fr; 2022 Sep; 93(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 36217587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mandibular changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear.
    Lima Filho RM; Lima AL; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jul; 124(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 12867902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
    Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stability of Class II malocclusion treatment with Class II elastics.
    Janson G; Niederberger ALG; Janson G; Valerio MV; Caldas W; Valarelli FP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 May; 163(5):609-617. PubMed ID: 36775752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Upper airway dimensions in Class II malocclusion. Effects of headgear treatment.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1046-53. PubMed ID: 18004913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Changes of Occlusal Plane in Growing Patients With Increased Vertical Dimension During Class II Correction by Using Cervical Headgear.
    Sambataro S; Lorusso P; Caprioglio A; Franchi L; Cicciù M; Fastuca R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(1):172-177. PubMed ID: 31842074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
    Uner O; Akkaya S; Buyruk F
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Treatment effects of Fränkel, activator and extraoral traction appliances.
    Righellis EG
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Apr; 53(2):107-21. PubMed ID: 6576650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cervical headgear treatment and growth patterns: analysis by lateral cephalometry.
    Godt A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jan; 68(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 17238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Molar changes with cervical headgear alone or in combination with rapid maxillary expansion.
    Marchiori Farret M; de Lima EM; Pereira Araújo V; Deon Rizzatto SM; Macedo de Menezes L; Lima Grossi M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):847-51. PubMed ID: 18298206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Study of the structural compensation of the mandible during treatment with cervical headgear].
    Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan AS
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 2489161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The effect of cervical headgear and lower utility arch on the control of vertical dimension in tooth and jaw].
    Zhang L; Luo Y; Wang RF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Aug; 19(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 20871954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of straight-pull headgear on the eruption pattern of maxillary canines: a retrospective study.
    Fichera G; Greco M; Caltabiano M; Leonardi R
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 19582255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.