237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27871715)
1. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models].
Jedlińska A
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 19374240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation and agreement of a digital and conventional method to measure arch parameters.
Nawi N; Mohamed AM; Marizan Nor M; Ashar NA
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 29116344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement in the determination of preformed wire shape templates on plaster models and customized digital arch form diagrams on digital models.
Camardella LT; Sá MDSB; Guimarães LC; Vilella BS; Vilella OV
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):377-386. PubMed ID: 29501113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton ratios using Bibliocast Cécile3 digital models.
Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Junior HM; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
Int Orthod; 2010 Sep; 8(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 20739241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models.
Goonewardene RW; Goonewardene MS; Razza JM; Murray K
Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19113071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of 3-dimensional curvilinear measurements on digital models with intraoral scanners.
Mack S; Bonilla T; English JD; Cozad B; Akyalcin S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28863923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dental measurements based on a three-dimensional digital technique: A comparative study on reliability and validity.
Liu J; Liu Y; Wang J; Zuo X; Wang X; Zhang Y; He H
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Apr; 124():105059. PubMed ID: 33508626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of linear and angular dental measurements with the OrthoMechanics Sequential Analyzer.
Talaat S; Kaboudan A; Breuning H; Ragy N; Elshebiny T; Kula K; Ghoneima A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 25636561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of a computed tomography scanning procedure to manufacture digital models.
Darroudi AM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Ongkosuwito EM; Suttorp CM; Bronkhorst EM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 28457278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
