BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

567 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27873187)

  • 1. Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.
    Rhodes MG; Witherby AE; Castel AD; Murayama K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27873187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fate of being forgotten: information that is initially forgotten is judged as less important.
    Castel AD; Rhodes MG; McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC; Loaiza VM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2281-7. PubMed ID: 23163866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aging and forgetting: Forgotten information is perceived as less important than is remembered information.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK; Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):228-241. PubMed ID: 30550310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metamemory that matters: judgments of importance can engage responsible remembering.
    Murphy DH; Castel AD
    Memory; 2021 Mar; 29(3):271-283. PubMed ID: 33726614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responsible remembering and forgetting as contributors to memory for important information.
    Murphy DH; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):895-911. PubMed ID: 33474691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory.
    Mitchum AL; Kelley CM; Fox MC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Feb; 145(2):200-19. PubMed ID: 27045282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):647-58. PubMed ID: 25388520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On belief and fluency in the construction of judgments of learning: Assessing and altering the direct effects of belief.
    Blake AB; Castel AD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():27-38. PubMed ID: 29689481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering.
    Murphy DH; Huckins SC; Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):910-921. PubMed ID: 34846689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):639-650. PubMed ID: 27987115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of identical word pairs on people's metamemory judgments: What are the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs about memory?
    Mueller ML; Dunlosky J; Tauber SK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):781-99. PubMed ID: 26059683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are we aware of our ability to forget? Metacognitive predictions of directed forgetting.
    Friedman MC; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1448-56. PubMed ID: 21638106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intuition and metacognition: The effect of semantic coherence on judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Zander T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1217-1224. PubMed ID: 27815819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.
    Cohen MS; Rissman J; Hovhannisyan M; Castel AD; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1581-1601. PubMed ID: 28394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance.
    Besken M; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Aug; 41(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 23460317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of emotional valence and font size on metacognition and memory.
    Agadzhanyan K; Castel AD
    Memory; 2024 Feb; 32(2):252-263. PubMed ID: 38289343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.
    Yang C; Sun B; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):384-397. PubMed ID: 29164524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.