238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27873469)
1. Variation of cytopathologists' use of the indeterminate diagnostic categories "atypical" and "suspicious for malignancy" in the cytologic diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates.
Virk RK; Gamez R; Mehrotra S; Atieh M; Barkan GA; Wojcik EM; Pambuccian SE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Jan; 45(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 27873469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Suboptimal Agreement Among Cytopathologists in Diagnosis of Malignancy Based on Endoscopic Ultrasound Needle Aspirates of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Validation Study.
Marshall C; Mounzer R; Hall M; Simon V; Centeno B; Dennis K; Dhillon J; Fan F; Khazai L; Klapman J; Komanduri S; Lin X; Lu D; Mehrotra S; Muthusamy VR; Nayar R; Paintal A; Rao J; Sams S; Shah J; Watson R; Rastogi A; Wani S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Jul; 16(7):1114-1122.e2. PubMed ID: 28911946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma.
Eloubeidi MA; Jhala D; Chhieng DC; Chen VK; Eltoum I; Vickers S; Mel Wilcox C; Jhala N
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 14579295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The frequency and cancer risk associated with the atypical cytologic diagnostic category in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis and argument for a Bethesda System for Reporting Cytopathology of the Pancreas.
Abdelgawwad MS; Alston E; Eltoum IA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Nov; 121(11):620-8. PubMed ID: 23881871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver Agreement among Cytopathologists in False-Negative Cases by Cytological Diagnosis with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Shi C; Li S; Chen L; Hong J; Bao J; Xu Z; Xu J; Mei Q
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(3):240-247. PubMed ID: 37263259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of the diagnostic categories "atypical" and "suspicious for malignancy" in the cytologic diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.
Layfield LJ; Schmidt RL; Hirschowitz SL; Olson MT; Ali SZ; Dodd LL
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 24578254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in 179 cases: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
Shin HJ; Lahoti S; Sneige N
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 12115306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up of indeterminate cytologic diagnoses of solid pancreatic lesions: atypia versus suspicious (one institution's experience).
Ikemura K; Yan L; Park JW
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2018; 7(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 31043311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fine-needle aspiration: potential pitfalls in one institution's experience of 1212 procedures.
Bergeron JP; Perry KD; Houser PM; Yang J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Feb; 123(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 25410732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in pancreatic pathology practice before and after implementation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: an example of disruptive innovation effect?
Eltoum IA; Alston EA; Roberson J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 22458907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in small solid pancreatic masses with previous indeterminate and negative cytological findings.
Tadic M; Kujundzic M; Stoos-Veic T; Kaic G; Vukelic-Markovic M
Dig Dis; 2008; 26(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19188731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of malignancy in patients with suspicious or indeterminate cytology on pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a multivariate model.
Yang D; MoezArdalan K; Collins DP; Chauhan SS; Draganov PV; Forsmark CE; Wagh MS
Pancreas; 2014 Aug; 43(6):922-6. PubMed ID: 24979616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sun B; Yang X; Ping B; He Y; Zhang Z
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24837987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial.
Wani S; Early D; Kunkel J; Leathersich A; Hovis CE; Hollander TG; Kohlmeier C; Zelenka C; Azar R; Edmundowicz S; Collins B; Liu J; Hall M; Mullady D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 22695205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Malignancy risk for the categories: Non-diagnostic, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant used in the categorization of endobronchial ultrasound guided-fine needle aspirates of pulmonary nodules.
Layfield LJ; Dodd L; Witt B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):892-6. PubMed ID: 26331778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suspicious cytologic diagnostic category in endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA of the pancreas: Follow-up and outcomes.
Alston EA; Bae S; Eltoum IA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jan; 124(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26335261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. KRAS mutation testing on all non-malignant diagnosis of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies improves diagnostic accuracy.
Trisolini E; Armellini E; Paganotti A; Veggiani C; Bozzola C; Frattini M; Pizio C; Mancuso G; Andorno S; Boldorini R
Pathology; 2017 Jun; 49(4):379-386. PubMed ID: 28450086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atypical cells in fine needle aspiration biopsies of pancreas: Causes, work-up, and recommendations for management.
HooKim K; Reid MD
Diagn Cytopathol; 2022 Apr; 50(4):196-207. PubMed ID: 34378874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens.
Mounzer R; Yen R; Marshall C; Sams S; Mehrotra S; Said MS; Obuch JC; Brauer B; Attwell A; Fukami N; Shah R; Amateau S; Hall M; Hosford L; Wilson R; Rastogi A; Wani S
Endosc Int Open; 2016 Jul; 4(7):E812-9. PubMed ID: 27556103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
