These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27873538)

  • 1. The effects of elevated hearing thresholds on performance in a paintball simulation of individual dismounted combat.
    Sheffield B; Brungart D; Tufts J; Ness J
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):34-40. PubMed ID: 27873538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus.
    Paul BT; Bruce IC; Roberts LE
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():170-182. PubMed ID: 27888040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual acoustic environments for comprehensive evaluation of model-based hearing devices.
    Grimm G; Luberadzka J; Hohmann V
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S112-S117. PubMed ID: 27813439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and evaluation of the British English coordinate response measure speech-in-noise test as an occupational hearing assessment tool.
    Semeraro HD; Rowan D; van Besouw RM; Allsopp AA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):749-758. PubMed ID: 28537138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of noise on speech recognition: Challenges for communication by service members.
    Le Prell CG; Clavier OH
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():76-89. PubMed ID: 27743882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant.
    Plant K; Babic L
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S31-8. PubMed ID: 26987051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
    Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Svec A; Dubno JR; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43. PubMed ID: 25786946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD.
    Narne VK; Barman A; Deepthi M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An individualised acoustically transparent earpiece for hearing devices.
    Denk F; Hiipakka M; Kollmeier B; Ernst SMA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S62-S70. PubMed ID: 28635506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refining a model of hearing impairment using speech psychophysics.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T; Ghitza O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):EL179-85. PubMed ID: 25236151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of life, effort and disturbance perceived in noise: a comparison between employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing.
    Hua H; Karlsson J; Widén S; Möller C; Lyxell B
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Sep; 52(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 23808681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversation tactics in persons with normal hearing and hearing-impairment.
    Hallam RS; Corney R
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 24286349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hartley D; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24447234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the problem of listening while talking.
    Borg E; Gustafsson D; Bergkvist C; Wikström C
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2009 Dec; 34(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 19883169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing impairment and self-masking: listening during vocalization.
    Borg E; Wikström C; Gustafsson D
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 22686438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.