172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27875101)
21. Application of PUF foam inserts for respirable dust measurements in the brick-manufacturing industry.
De Vocht F; Hirst A; Gardner A
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jan; 53(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 18977848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Measurements of respirable dust and nanoparticle concentrations in a titanium dioxide pigment production factory.
Huang CH; Tai CY; Huang CY; Tsai CJ; Chen CW; Chang CP; Shih TS
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010 Aug; 45(10):1227-33. PubMed ID: 20623401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of the CATHIA-T sampler, the GK2.69 cyclone and the standard cowled sampler for thoracic fiber concentrations at a Taconite (iron ore)-processing mill.
Lee EG; Harper M; Nelson J; Hintz PJ; Andrew ME
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Jan; 52(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18195326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of pump pulsation in respirable size-selective sampling: part II. Changes in sampling efficiency.
Lee EG; Lee T; Kim SW; Lee L; Flemmer MM; Harper M
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Jan; 58(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 24064963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Exposure to fuel-oil ash and welding emissions during the overhaul of an oil-fired boiler.
Liu Y; Woodin MA; Smith TJ; Herrick RF; Williams PL; Hauser R; Christiani DC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Sep; 2(9):435-43. PubMed ID: 16048845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Respirable size-selective sampler for end-of-shift quartz measurement: Development and performance.
Lee T; Lee L; Cauda E; Hummer J; Harper M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 May; 14(5):335-342. PubMed ID: 27792471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sampling Efficiency and Performance of Selected Thoracic Aerosol Samplers.
Görner P; Simon X; Boivin A; Bau S
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Aug; 61(7):784-796. PubMed ID: 28810686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accurate quantification of tio2 nanoparticles collected on air filters using a microwave-assisted acid digestion method.
Mudunkotuwa IA; Anthony TR; Grassian VH; Peters TM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016; 13(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 26181824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
Lidén G; Surakka J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterizing exposures to airborne metals and nanoparticle emissions in a refinery.
Miller A; Drake PL; Hintz P; Habjan M
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Jul; 54(5):504-13. PubMed ID: 20403942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparability of portable nanoparticle exposure monitors.
Asbach C; Kaminski H; von Barany D; Kuhlbusch TA; Monz C; Dziurowitz N; Pelzer J; Vossen K; Berlin K; Dietrich S; Götz U; Kiesling HJ; Schierl R; Dahmann D
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):606-21. PubMed ID: 22752099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Equivalency of a personal dust monitor to the current United States coal mine respirable dust sampler.
Page SJ; Volkwein JC; Vinson RP; Joy GJ; Mischler SE; Tuchman DP; McWilliams LJ
J Environ Monit; 2008 Jan; 10(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18175022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of a condensation particle counter and an optical particle counter to assess the number concentration of engineered nanoparticles.
Schmoll LH; Peters TM; O'Shaughnessy PT
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Sep; 7(9):535-45. PubMed ID: 20614365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Simple and Disposable Sampler for Inhalable Aerosol.
L'Orange C; Anderson K; Sleeth D; Anthony TR; Volckens J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Mar; 60(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 26467335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cotton dust and endotoxin levels in three Shanghai textile factories: a comparison of samplers.
Astrakianakis G; Seixas N; Camp J; Smith TJ; Bartlett K; Checkoway H
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Aug; 3(8):418-27. PubMed ID: 16862712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility.
Anthony TR; Cai C; Mehaffy J; Sleeth D; Volckens J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 May; 14(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 27792469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficiency of five chemical protective clothing materials against nano and submicron aerosols when submitted to mechanical deformations.
Ben Salah M; Hallé S; Tuduri L
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016; 13(6):425-33. PubMed ID: 26786065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.
Thorpe A; Walsh PT
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):679-91. PubMed ID: 18024485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
