These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27875937)

  • 1. Operator adaptation to changes in system reliability under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Sauer J
    Ergonomics; 2017 Sep; 60(9):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 27875937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of adaptable automation: Effects of extended skill lay-off and changes in system reliability.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():471-481. PubMed ID: 27633244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of extended lay-off periods on performance and operator trust under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():241-51. PubMed ID: 26603139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experience of automation failures in training: effects on trust, automation bias, complacency and performance.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A; Wastell D
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):767-80. PubMed ID: 26374396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. System reliability, performance and trust in adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():333-42. PubMed ID: 26360226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a brain-based adaptive system and a manual adaptable system for invoking automation.
    Bailey NR; Scerbo MW; Freeman FG; Mikulka PJ; Scott LA
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):693-709. PubMed ID: 17240718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automation in visual inspection tasks: X-ray luggage screening supported by a system of direct, indirect or adaptable cueing with low and high system reliability.
    Chavaillaz A; Schwaninger A; Michel S; Sauer J
    Ergonomics; 2018 Oct; 61(10):1395-1408. PubMed ID: 29799358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Modeling and Simulation to Predict Operator Performance and Automation-Induced Complacency With Robotic Automation: A Case Study and Empirical Validation.
    Wickens CD; Sebok A; Li H; Sarter N; Gacy AM
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):959-75. PubMed ID: 25850111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Displaying contextual information reduces the costs of imperfect decision automation in rapid retasking of ISR assets.
    Rovira E; Cross A; Leitch E; Bonaceto C
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1036-49. PubMed ID: 25277015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting a Single Automation Failure: The Impact of Expected (But Not Experienced) Automation Reliability.
    Bowden VK; Griffiths N; Strickland L; Loft S
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):533-545. PubMed ID: 34375538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Providing different levels of accuracy about the reliability of automation to a human operator: impact on human performance.
    Avril E
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):217-226. PubMed ID: 35451925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.
    Wright JL; Chen JYC; Barnes MJ
    Ergonomics; 2018 Aug; 61(8):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 29451105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of automation reliability on error detection and attention to auditory stimuli in a multi-tasking environment.
    Ferraro JC; Mouloua M
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Feb; 91():103303. PubMed ID: 33176254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of adaptive and adaptable automation under different levels of environmental stress.
    Sauer J; Kao CS; Wastell D
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(8):840-53. PubMed ID: 22506767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automation reliability, human-machine system performance, and operator compliance: A study with airport security screeners supported by automated explosives detection systems for cabin baggage screening.
    Huegli D; Merks S; Schwaninger A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jul; 86():103094. PubMed ID: 32342885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task.
    Beck HR; Dzindolet MT; Pierce LG
    Hum Factors; 2007 Jun; 49(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 17552307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Role of Trust as a Mediator Between System Characteristics and Response Behaviors.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Proaps AB; Madhavan P
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):947-58. PubMed ID: 25917611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.