These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27878050)

  • 1. Suboptimal use of pelvic lymph node dissection: Differences in guideline adherence between robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy.
    Schiffmann J; Larcher A; Sun M; Tian Z; Berdugo J; Leva I; Widmer H; Lattouf JB; Zorn KC; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Saad F; Karakiewicz PI
    Can Urol Assoc J; 2016 Aug; 10(7-8):269-276. PubMed ID: 27878050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Schiffmann J; Haese A; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Salomon G; Steuber T; Schlomm T; Boehm K; Beyer B; Larcher A; Michl U; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1547-53. PubMed ID: 26117216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the use and extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in the "post-dissemination" period.
    Gandaglia G; Trinh QD; Hu JC; Schiffmann J; Becker A; Roghmann F; Popa I; Tian Z; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M; Abdollah F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1080-6. PubMed ID: 24411705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adherence to pelvic lymph node dissection recommendations according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network pelvic lymph node dissection guideline and the D'Amico lymph node invasion risk stratification.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Budäus L; Zaffuto E; Pompe RS; Bandini M; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Schiffmann J; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Chun F; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Feb; 36(2):81.e17-81.e24. PubMed ID: 29248430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.
    Borkowetz A; Bruendl J; Drerup M; Herrmann J; Isbarn H; Beyer B;
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):855-861. PubMed ID: 29427005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era.
    Truesdale MD; Lee DJ; Cheetham PJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Badani KK
    J Endourol; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1055-60. PubMed ID: 20575697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.
    Suardi N; Larcher A; Haese A; Ficarra V; Govorov A; Buffi NM; Walz J; Rocco B; Borghesi M; Steuber T; Pini G; Briganti A; Mottrie AM; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Pushkar D; Van Der Poel H;
    Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 24411992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. North American Population-Based Validation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Practice Guideline Recommendation of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Contemporary Prostate Cancer.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Budäus L; Pompe R; Zaffuto E; Briganti A; Abdollah F; Montorsi F; Schiffmann J; Menon M; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Chun F; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Prostate; 2017 Apr; 77(5):542-548. PubMed ID: 28093788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in Patient Characteristics Among Men Choosing Open or Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Contemporary Practice at a European High-Volume Center.
    Schiffmann J; Haese A; Lenz J; Heinzer H; Salomon G; Steuber T; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Tennstedt P; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Urol Int; 2016; 97(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26780655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.
    Ong WL; Evans SM; Spelman T; Kearns PA; Murphy DG; Millar JL
    BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 26573954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature.
    Ploussard G; Briganti A; de la Taille A; Haese A; Heidenreich A; Menon M; Sulser T; Tewari AK; Eastham JA
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 23582879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A population-based assessment of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guideline indications for pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy.
    Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Sun M; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Abdo A; Tian Z; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
    BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109(8):1177-82. PubMed ID: 21880105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contemporary National Trends and Variations of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Xia L; Chen B; Jones A; Talwar R; Chelluri RR; Lee DJ; Guzzo TJ
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Aug; 19(4):309-315. PubMed ID: 33663952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting lymph node invasion in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Abdollah F; Klett DE; Sammon JD; Dalela D; Sood A; Hsu L; Diaz M; Gupta N; Peabody JO; Trinh QD; Menon M
    Can J Urol; 2016 Feb; 23(1):8141-50. PubMed ID: 26892054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Assessing Utility and Nodal Metastases Within a Statewide Quality Improvement Consortium.
    Kuperus JM; Tobert CM; Semerjian AM; Qi J; Lane BR;
    Urology; 2022 Jul; 165():227-236. PubMed ID: 35263639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Herlemann A; Cowan JE; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
    Eur Urol; 2018 Feb; 73(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 28499617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. External validation of the European association of urology recommendations for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Dell'Oglio P; Abdollah F; Suardi N; Gallina A; Cucchiara V; Vizziello D; Zaffuto E; Cantiello F; Damiano R; Shariat S; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    J Endourol; 2014 Apr; 28(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 24188052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extent of lymph node dissection improves survival in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy without lymph node invasion.
    Preisser F; Bandini M; Marchioni M; Nazzani S; Tian Z; Pompe RS; Fossati N; Briganti A; Saad F; Shariat SF; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
    Prostate; 2018 May; 78(6):469-475. PubMed ID: 29460290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utilization of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Modi PK; Bock M; Kim S; Singer EA; Parikh RR
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Dec; 15(6):e1001-e1006. PubMed ID: 28558990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. When and how?
    Sierra PS; Lestingi JFP; Albuquerque EV; Pontes J; de Carvalho PA; Cavalcante A; Guglielmetti GB; Nahas WC; Coelho RF
    Arch Esp Urol; 2019 Apr; 72(3):257-265. PubMed ID: 30945652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.