333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27879038)
1. Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide.
Forstmeier W; Wagenmakers EJ; Parker TH
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Nov; 92(4):1941-1968. PubMed ID: 27879038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Pitfalls in the statistical world].
Kiese-Himmel C; Plontke SK
HNO; 2020 Jan; 68(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 31501916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate.
Bryan CJ; Yeager DS; O'Brien JM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(51):25535-25545. PubMed ID: 31767750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies.
Glickman ME; Rao SR; Schultz MR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):850-7. PubMed ID: 24831050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Problem of False Discovery: Many Scientific Results Can't Be Replicated, Leading to Serious Questions about What's True and False in the World of Research.
Foster KR; Skufca J
IEEE Pulse; 2016; 7(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 26978851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.
Murayama K; Pekrun R; Fiedler K
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 May; 18(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 23965303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Making ERP research more transparent: Guidelines for preregistration.
Paul M; Govaart GH; Schettino A
Int J Psychophysiol; 2021 Jun; 164():52-63. PubMed ID: 33676957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Issues of research in medicine].
Topić E
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():5-16. PubMed ID: 16526304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.
Nissen SB; Magidson T; Gross K; Bergstrom CT
Elife; 2016 Dec; 5():. PubMed ID: 27995896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices.
Andrade C
J Clin Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 82(1):. PubMed ID: 33999541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
Groenvold M
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Statistical
Wei YY; Chen F
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 May; 53(5):441-444. PubMed ID: 31091597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preregistration in practice: A comparison of preregistered and non-preregistered studies in psychology.
van den Akker OR; van Assen MALM; Bakker M; Elsherif M; Wong TK; Wicherts JM
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37950113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
Jager LR; Leek JT
Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24068246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis?
Lazic SE
BMC Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 11():5. PubMed ID: 20074371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false.
Ioannidis JP
Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):28-36; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery.
McElreath R; Smaldino PE
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136088. PubMed ID: 26308448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.
Picardi N
Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of plausibility in the evaluation of scientific research.
Almeida RM
Rev Saude Publica; 2011 Jun; 45(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 21552759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
