325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27880023)
1. Effect of Cyclic Fatigue Tests on Aging and Their Translational Implications for Survival of All-Ceramic Tooth-Borne Single Crowns and Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Özcan M; Jonasch M
J Prosthodont; 2018 Apr; 27(4):364-375. PubMed ID: 27880023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses?
Anusavice KJ; Kakar K; Ferree N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():218-31. PubMed ID: 17594384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Alkharrat AR; Schmitter M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 29196948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fatigue resistance and failure modes between metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns by cyclic loading in water.
Nicolaisen MH; Bahrami G; Finlay S; Isidor F
J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1613-20. PubMed ID: 25174946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture Resistance of Straight and Angulated Zirconia Implant Abutments Supporting Anterior Three-Unit Lithium Disilicate Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Saker S; El-Shahat S; Ghazy M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 27861648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).
Sailer I; Makarov NA; Thoma DS; Zwahlen M; Pjetursson BE
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):603-23. PubMed ID: 25842099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture Strength of Implant-Supported Ceramic Crowns with Customized Zirconia Abutments: Screw Retained vs. Cement Retained.
Nogueira LB; Moura CD; Francischone CE; Valente VS; Alencar SM; Moura WL; Soares Martins GA
J Prosthodont; 2016 Jan; 25(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 25754496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lithium Disilicate Restorations Fatigue Testing Parameters: A Systematic Review.
Nawafleh N; Hatamleh M; Elshiyab S; Mack F
J Prosthodont; 2016 Feb; 25(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 26505638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro performance and fracture resistance of pressed or CAD/CAM milled ceramic implant-supported screw-retained or cemented anterior FDPs.
Zacher J; Bauer R; Hanie Krifka S; Rosentritt M
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Jun; 65(2):208-212. PubMed ID: 32938865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proof testing to improve the reliability and lifetime of ceramic dental prostheses.
Jadaan O; Esquivel-Upshaw J; Nemeth NN; Baker E
Dent Mater; 2023 Feb; 39(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 36707313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Loading capacity of zirconia implant supported hybrid ceramic crowns.
Rohr N; Coldea A; Zitzmann NU; Fischer J
Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):e279-88. PubMed ID: 26458762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ten-year survival and complication rates of lithium-disilicate (Empress 2) tooth-supported crowns, implant-supported crowns, and fixed dental prostheses.
Teichmann M; Göckler F; Weber V; Yildirim M; Wolfart S; Edelhoff D
J Dent; 2017 Jan; 56():65-77. PubMed ID: 27984088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of dynamic aging on the wear and fracture strength of monolithic zirconia restorations.
Sarıkaya I; Hayran Y
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):146. PubMed ID: 30139339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EAO Position Paper: Material Selection for Implant-Supported Restorations.
Pjetursson BE; Fehmer V; Sailer I
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 35230351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
