316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27881078)
1. No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.
van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):163. PubMed ID: 27881078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.
Peduzzi P; Concato J; Kemper E; Holford TR; Feinstein AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Dec; 49(12):1373-9. PubMed ID: 8970487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria.
van Smeden M; Moons KG; de Groot JA; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2455-2474. PubMed ID: 29966490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simulation study of sample size demonstrated the importance of the number of events per variable to develop prediction models in clustered data.
Wynants L; Bouwmeester W; Moons KG; Moerbeek M; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1406-14. PubMed ID: 25817942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adequate sample size for developing prediction models is not simply related to events per variable.
Ogundimu EO; Altman DG; Collins GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():175-82. PubMed ID: 26964707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure.
Courvoisier DS; Combescure C; Agoritsas T; Gayet-Ageron A; Perneger TV
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 21411281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The number of primary events per variable affects estimation of the subdistribution hazard competing risks model.
Austin PC; Allignol A; Fine JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():75-84. PubMed ID: 28088594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bring More Data!-A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size.
Šinkovec H; Geroldinger A; Heinze G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(23):. PubMed ID: 31766753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. To tune or not to tune, a case study of ridge logistic regression in small or sparse datasets.
Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Blagus R; Geroldinger A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 34592945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis.
Steyerberg EW; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD
J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Oct; 52(10):935-42. PubMed ID: 10513756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models.
Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):796-808. PubMed ID: 25411322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo methods in clinical research: applications in multivariable analysis.
Concato J; Feinstein AR
J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 9291696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias in Odds Ratios From Logistic Regression Methods With Sparse Data Sets.
Gosho M; Ohigashi T; Nagashima K; Ito Y; Maruo K
J Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 33(6):265-275. PubMed ID: 34565762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On estimation for accelerated failure time models with small or rare event survival data.
Alam TF; Rahman MS; Bari W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):169. PubMed ID: 35689190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shrinkage methods enhanced the accuracy of parameter estimation using Cox models with small number of events.
Lin IF; Chang WP; Liao YN
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):743-51. PubMed ID: 23566374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates.
Peduzzi P; Concato J; Feinstein AR; Holford TR
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Dec; 48(12):1503-10. PubMed ID: 8543964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regression shrinkage methods for clinical prediction models do not guarantee improved performance: Simulation study.
Van Calster B; van Smeden M; De Cock B; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3166-3178. PubMed ID: 32401702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An investigation of penalization and data augmentation to improve convergence of generalized estimating equations for clustered binary outcomes.
Geroldinger A; Blagus R; Ogden H; Heinze G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):168. PubMed ID: 35681120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
