These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27881193)

  • 1. Message framing in the context of the national menu-labelling policy: a comparison of public health and private industry interests.
    Shelton RC; Colgrove J; Lee G; Truong M; Wingood GM
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Apr; 20(5):814-823. PubMed ID: 27881193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nutrition policy in whose interests? A New Zealand case study.
    Jenkin G; Signal L; Thomson G
    Public Health Nutr; 2012 Aug; 15(8):1483-8. PubMed ID: 22115416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nutrient labelling: legislating against too much information?
    Kirby T
    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2016 Jul; 4(7):568. PubMed ID: 27180138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advocacy coalitions involved in California's menu labeling policy debate: Exploring coalition structure, policy beliefs, resources, and strategies.
    Payán DD; Lewis LB; Cousineau MR; Nichol MB
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Mar; 177():78-86. PubMed ID: 28161674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global Governance of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling: A Qualitative Analysis.
    Thow AM; Jones A; Schneider CH; Labonté R
    Nutrients; 2019 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30691024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Menu-labeling policy in King County, Washington.
    Johnson DB; Payne EC; McNeese MA; Allen D
    Am J Prev Med; 2012 Sep; 43(3 Suppl 2):S130-5. PubMed ID: 22898162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Framing obesity: the framing contest between industry and public health at the New Zealand inquiry into obesity.
    Jenkin GL; Signal L; Thomson G
    Obes Rev; 2011 Dec; 12(12):1022-30. PubMed ID: 21831231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Food industry: friend or foe?
    Yach D
    Obes Rev; 2014 Jan; 15(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 24180599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Framing a New Nutrition Policy: Changes on Key Stakeholder's Discourses throughout the Implementation of the Chilean Food Labelling Law.
    Mediano F; Fierro C; Corvalán C; Reyes M; Correa T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 May; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 37174218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Law of Food Labelling and Advertising: Chile innovating in public nutrition once again].
    Rodríguez Osiac L; Pizarro Quevedo T
    Rev Chil Pediatr; 2018 Oct; 89(5):579-581. PubMed ID: 30571799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trade and nutrition policy coherence: a framing analysis and Australian case study.
    Baker P; Friel S; Gleeson D; Thow AM; Labonte R
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Aug; 22(12):2329-2337. PubMed ID: 31111806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The acceptability to stakeholders of mandatory nutritional labelling in France and the UK--findings from the PorGrow project.
    Holdsworth M; Delpeuch F; Kameli Y; Lobstein T; Millstone E
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2010 Feb; 23(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 19843198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Limits of self regulation of the private food sector: the case of removing of vending machines from schools].
    Michaud C; Baudier F
    Sante Publique; 2007; 19(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 17561737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The political construction of public health nutrition problems: a framing analysis of parliamentary debates on junk-food marketing to children in Australia.
    Russell C; Lawrence M; Cullerton K; Baker P
    Public Health Nutr; 2020 Aug; 23(11):2041-2052. PubMed ID: 31948503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nutrition labelling is a trade policy issue: lessons from an analysis of specific trade concerns at the World Trade Organization.
    Thow AM; Jones A; Hawkes C; Ali I; Labonté R
    Health Promot Int; 2018 Aug; 33(4):561-571. PubMed ID: 28082373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generating political priority for regulatory interventions targeting obesity prevention: an Australian case study.
    Baker P; Gill T; Friel S; Carey G; Kay A
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Mar; 177():141-149. PubMed ID: 28161671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Food industry political practices in Chile: "the economy has always been the main concern".
    Mialon M; Corvalan C; Cediel G; Scagliusi FB; Reyes M
    Global Health; 2020 Oct; 16(1):107. PubMed ID: 33109216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why food policy and obesity policy are not synonymous: the need to establish clear obesity policy in the United States.
    Stanford FC; Kyle TK
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2015 Dec; 39(12):1667-8. PubMed ID: 26643152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obesity--the new frontier of public health law.
    Mello MM; Studdert DM; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Jun; 354(24):2601-10. PubMed ID: 16775242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Policy options for obesity in Europe: a comparison of public health specialists with other stakeholders.
    González-Zapata LI; Alvarez-Dardet C; Ortiz-Moncada R; Clemente V; Millstone E; Holdsworth M; Sarri K; Tarlao G; Horvath Z; Lobstein T; Savva S
    Public Health Nutr; 2009 Jul; 12(7):896-908. PubMed ID: 18662488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.