431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27881276)
1. The Development of the Romanian Scorecard HTA System.
Radu CP; Chiriac ND; Pravat AM
Value Health Reg Issues; 2016 Sep; 10():41-47. PubMed ID: 27881276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN ROMANIA.
Scintee SG; Ciutan M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(3):371-375. PubMed ID: 28436346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Drug Policy in Romania.
Radu CP; Pana BC; Furtunescu FL
Value Health Reg Issues; 2018 Sep; 16():28-32. PubMed ID: 29704726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applying rapid 'de-facto' HTA in resource-limited settings: experience from Romania.
Lopert R; Ruiz F; Chalkidou K
Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 112(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 23953877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing Use of Health Technology Assessment in Pharmaceutical Policy among Earlier and More Recent Adopters in the European Union.
Beletsi A; Koutrafouri V; Karampli E; Pavi E
Value Health Reg Issues; 2018 Sep; 16():81-91. PubMed ID: 30316029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health technology assessment for cancer medicines across the G7 countries and Oceania: an international, cross-sectional study.
Jenei K; Raymakers AJN; Bayle A; Berger-Thürmel K; Cherla A; Honda K; Jackson CCGA; Karikios D; Trapani D; Berry S; Gyawali B
Lancet Oncol; 2023 Jun; 24(6):624-635. PubMed ID: 37269843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why do health technology assessment coverage recommendations for the same drugs differ across settings? Applying a mixed methods framework to systematically compare orphan drug decisions in four European countries.
Nicod E
Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Jul; 18(6):715-730. PubMed ID: 27538758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Policies for Use of Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA): A Comparative Study of Six HTA Agencies.
Makady A; Ham RT; de Boer A; Hillege H; Klungel O; Goettsch W;
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):520-532. PubMed ID: 28407993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eight-year experience of using HTA in drug reimbursement: South Korea.
Bae EY; Hong JM; Kwon HY; Jang S; Lee HJ; Bae S; Yang BM
Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 120(6):612-20. PubMed ID: 27086557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The correlation between HTA recommendations and reimbursement status of orphan drugs in Europe.
Kawalec P; Sagan A; Pilc A
Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Sep; 11(1):122. PubMed ID: 27600717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. INTRODUCTION OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR MEDICINES IN SLOVAKIA.
Tesar T; Hloska A; Wawruch M; Lehocka L; Snopkova M; Masarykova L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(3):345-349. PubMed ID: 28434416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in Health Technology Assessment Recommendations Among European Jurisdictions: The Role of Practice Variations.
Vreman RA; Mantel-Teeuwisse AK; Hövels AM; Leufkens HGM; Goettsch WG
Value Health; 2020 Jan; 23(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 31952664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A DECADE OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN POLAND.
Lipska I; McAuslane N; Leufkens H; Hövels A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 28720170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.
Zelei T; Molnár MJ; Szegedi M; Kaló Z
Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Jun; 11(1):72. PubMed ID: 27259284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN EVALUATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
Vostalová L; Mazelová J; Samek J; Vocelka M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(3):339-344. PubMed ID: 28438231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe.
Malinowski KP; Kawalec P; Trąbka W; Sowada C; Petrova G; Manova M; Savova A; Draganić P; Slabý J; Männik A; Márky K; Rugaja Z; Gulbinovic J; Tesar T; Paveliu MS
Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2020 Oct; 15(1):277. PubMed ID: 33032634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of archetypes for non-ranking classification and comparison of European National Health Technology Assessment systems.
Allen N; Pichler F; Wang T; Patel S; Salek S
Health Policy; 2013 Dec; 113(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 24176288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe.
Zamora B; Maignen F; O'Neill P; Mestre-Ferrandiz J; Garau M
Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2019 May; 14(1):95. PubMed ID: 31053154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Case Studies: Factors Influencing Divergent HTA Reimbursement Recommendations in Australia, Canada, England, and Scotland.
Allen N; Walker SR; Liberti L; Salek S
Value Health; 2017 Mar; 20(3):320-328. PubMed ID: 28292476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A regulatory governance perspective on health technology assessment (HTA) in France: the contextual mediation of common functional pressures.
Barron AJ; Klinger C; Shah SM; Wright JS
Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 119(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 25458970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]