These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
590 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27881799)
1. Water-deficit and fungal infection can differentially affect the production of different classes of defense compounds in two host pines of mountain pine beetle. Erbilgin N; Cale JA; Lusebrink I; Najar A; Klutsch JG; Sherwood P; Enrico Bonello P; Evenden ML Tree Physiol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):338-350. PubMed ID: 27881799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid monoterpene induction promotes the susceptibility of a novel host pine to mountain pine beetle colonization but not to beetle-vectored fungi. Cale JA; Muskens M; Najar A; Ishangulyyeva G; Hussain A; Kanekar SS; Klutsch JG; Taft S; Erbilgin N Tree Physiol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1597-1610. PubMed ID: 28985375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of water deficit on the molecular responses of Pinus contorta × Pinus banksiana mature trees to infection by the mountain pine beetle fungal associate, Grosmannia clavigera. Arango-Velez A; González LM; Meents MJ; El Kayal W; Cooke BJ; Linsky J; Lusebrink I; Cooke JE Tree Physiol; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1220-39. PubMed ID: 24319029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Native Parasitic Plant Systemically Induces Resistance in Jack Pine to a Fungal Symbiont of Invasive Mountain Pine Beetle. Klutsch JG; Najar A; Sherwood P; Bonello P; Erbilgin N J Chem Ecol; 2017 May; 43(5):506-518. PubMed ID: 28466378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential effects of plant ontogeny and damage type on phloem and foliage monoterpenes in jack pine (Pinus banksiana). Erbilgin N; Colgan LJ Tree Physiol; 2012 Aug; 32(8):946-57. PubMed ID: 22659460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in defence responses of Pinus contorta and Pinus banksiana to the mountain pine beetle fungal associate Grosmannia clavigera are affected by water deficit. Arango-Velez A; El Kayal W; Copeland CC; Zaharia LI; Lusebrink I; Cooke JE Plant Cell Environ; 2016 Apr; 39(4):726-44. PubMed ID: 26205849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of water stress and fungal inoculation on monoterpene emission from an historical and a new pine host of the mountain pine beetle. Lusebrink I; Evenden ML; Blanchet FG; Cooke JE; Erbilgin N J Chem Ecol; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1013-26. PubMed ID: 21874397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The lodgepole × jack pine hybrid zone in Alberta, Canada: a stepping stone for the mountain pine beetle on its journey East across the boreal forest? Lusebrink I; Erbilgin N; Evenden ML J Chem Ecol; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1209-20. PubMed ID: 23955061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Successful Colonization of Lodgepole Pine Trees by Mountain Pine Beetle Increased Monoterpene Production and Exhausted Carbohydrate Reserves. Roth M; Hussain A; Cale JA; Erbilgin N J Chem Ecol; 2018 Feb; 44(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 29302834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence that Ophiostomatoid Fungal Symbionts of Mountain Pine Beetle Do Not Play a Role in Overcoming Lodgepole Pine Defenses During Mass Attack. Fortier CE; Musso AE; Evenden ML; Zaharia LI; Cooke JEK Mol Plant Microbe Interact; 2024 May; 37(5):445-458. PubMed ID: 38240660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pheromone Production by an Invasive Bark Beetle Varies with Monoterpene Composition of its Naïve Host. Taft S; Najar A; Erbilgin N J Chem Ecol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):540-9. PubMed ID: 26014128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcriptome resources and functional characterization of monoterpene synthases for two host species of the mountain pine beetle, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana). Hall DE; Yuen MM; Jancsik S; Quesada AL; Dullat HK; Li M; Henderson H; Arango-Velez A; Liao NY; Docking RT; Chan SK; Cooke JE; Breuil C; Jones SJ; Keeling CI; Bohlmann J BMC Plant Biol; 2013 May; 13():80. PubMed ID: 23679205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Soil Available Water Holding Capacity Can Alter the Reproductive Performance of Mountain Pine Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Jack Pine (Pinales: Pinaceae) Through Phloem Nitrogen Concentration. Hussain A; Classens G; Guevara-Rozo S; Erbilgin N Environ Entomol; 2019 Aug; 48(4):945-952. PubMed ID: 31120537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Host Defense Metabolites Alter the Interactions between a Bark Beetle and its Symbiotic Fungi. Agbulu V; Zaman R; Ishangulyyeva G; Cahill JF; Erbilgin N Microb Ecol; 2022 Oct; 84(3):834-843. PubMed ID: 34674014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The legacy of attack: implications of high phloem resin monoterpene levels in lodgepole pines following mass attack by mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins. Clark EL; Huber DP; Carroll AL Environ Entomol; 2012 Apr; 41(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 22507014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Naïve Pine Terpene Response to the Mountain Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) through the Seasons. Musso AE; Fortier C; Huber DPW; Carroll AL; Evenden ML J Chem Ecol; 2023 Jun; 49(5-6):299-312. PubMed ID: 36929332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Production of complementary defense metabolites reflects a co-evolutionary arms race between a host plant and a mutualistic bark beetle-fungal complex. Ullah A; Klutsch JG; Erbilgin N Plant Cell Environ; 2021 Sep; 44(9):3064-3077. PubMed ID: 34008191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induced Defenses of a Novel Host Tree Affect the Growth and Interactions of Bark Beetle-Vectored Fungi. Wang F; Cale JA; Erbilgin N Microb Ecol; 2020 Jul; 80(1):181-190. PubMed ID: 32020257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Pine in Distress: How Infection by Different Pathogenic Fungi Affect Lodgepole Pine Chemical Defenses. Zaman R; Antonioli F; Shah A; Ullah A; May C; Klutsch JG; Erbilgin N Microb Ecol; 2023 Nov; 86(4):2666-2673. PubMed ID: 37486583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathophysiological responses of pine defensive metabolites largely lack differences between pine species but vary with eliciting ophiostomatoid fungal species. Cale JA; Klutsch JG; Dykstra CB; Peters B; Erbilgin N Tree Physiol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1121-1135. PubMed ID: 30877758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]