168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27882394)
1. [Economic aspects of oncological esophageal surgery : Centralization is essential].
von Dercks N; Gockel I; Mehdorn M; Lorenz D
Chirurg; 2017 Jan; 88(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27882394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy.
Kuo EY; Chang Y; Wright CD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Oct; 72(4):1118-24. PubMed ID: 11603422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital volume is related to clinical and economic outcomes of esophageal resection in Maryland.
Dimick JB; Cattaneo SM; Lipsett PA; Pronovost PJ; Heitmiller RF
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Aug; 72(2):334-9; discussion 339-41. PubMed ID: 11515862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Profit center analysis of esophagectomy : Economical analysis of transthoracic esophagectomy depending on postoperative complications].
Baltin CT; Bludau M; Kron F; Zander T; Hallek M; Hölscher AH; Schröder W
Chirurg; 2018 Mar; 89(3):229-236. PubMed ID: 29417163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The quality of patient care under the German DRG system using as example the inguinal hernia repair].
Rudroff C; Schweins M; Heiss MM
Zentralbl Chir; 2008 Feb; 133(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 18278703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Minimum Caseload Requirements and In-hospital Mortality: Observational Study using Nationwide Hospital Discharge Data from 2006 to 2013].
Nimptsch U; Peschke D; Mansky T
Gesundheitswesen; 2017 Oct; 79(10):823-834. PubMed ID: 27050140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Thoughts on the economic aspects of management of severely injured patients with reference to "diagnostic related groups" (DRG). An initiative of the Specialized Committee of the German Health Care System].
Pape HC; Mahlke L; Schaefer O; Krettek C
Unfallchirurg; 2003 Oct; 106(10):869-73, discussion 873. PubMed ID: 14652730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer surgery in a mid-volume institution in the era of centralization.
Däster S; Soysal SD; Koechlin L; Stoll L; Peterli R; von Flüe M; Ackermann C
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 Sep; 401(6):787-95. PubMed ID: 27436366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Patient selection in tertiary hospitals based on economic data: exemplified by visceral surgery].
Schwenzer T; Jähne J
Chirurg; 2012 Mar; 83(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 22349787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Homogeneity of G-DRGs in ophthalmology].
Gass P; Neubauer AS; Kampik A
Ophthalmologe; 2004 Jul; 101(7):733-40. PubMed ID: 15197571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [G-DRG Version 2008: Facts and analyses].
Müller ML; Forschner A; Wenke A; Luger TA; Rompel R; Roeder N; Hensen P
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2008 Jun; 6(6):483-91. PubMed ID: 18494710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011.
Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Thrumurthy S; Low DE
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):1055-63. PubMed ID: 22089950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Development of DRGs in reconstructive breast surgery].
Lotter O; Amr A; Jaminet P; Hoefert S; Schaller HE; Stahl S
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2012 Apr; 44(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 22495963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals.
Fujita H; Ozawa S; Kuwano H; Ueda Y; Hattori S; Yanagawa T;
Dis Esophagus; 2010 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 19515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Esophageal cancer surgery should be centralized. Big surgical volume benefits the patients].
Lagergren J
Lakartidningen; 2007 Sep 26-Oct 2; 104(39):2782. PubMed ID: 17958002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Accordion severity grading system: assessment of relationship between costs, length of hospital stay, and survival in patients with complications after esophagectomy for cancer.
Carrott PW; Markar SR; Kuppusamy MK; Traverso LW; Low DE
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Sep; 215(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 22683069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reimbursement of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the German diagnosis related groups systems. Part 1: Basics and reimbursement in the case of conservative treatment].
Reinecke H; Bunzemeier H; Roeder N; Fürstenberg T; Breithardt G; Steinbeck G
Med Klin (Munich); 2006 Nov; 101(11):915-6. PubMed ID: 17235480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Total hip replacement in the G-DRG-system].
Kaufmann MM; Franz D; Lassahn C; Siebert CH
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2007; 145(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 17345545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A method for reassessment of cost-intensive cases in visceral surgery. Results of project by the German Society for Visceral Surgery].
Lohmann R; Schäfer O; Graeb C; Becker T; Lopez-Hänninen E; Maas S; Langrehr JM
Chirurg; 2007 Aug; 78(8):748-56. PubMed ID: 17646947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluating the first German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) in cardiological patients: problems in the correct medical and economic grouping].
Reinecke H; Bunzemeier H; Fürstenberg T; Rothenburger M; Böcker D; Scheld HH; Breithardt G; Roeder N
Z Kardiol; 2003 Jul; 92(7):581-94. PubMed ID: 12883843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
