These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2788363)

  • 1. The impact of changing methods of data collection on the reliability of self-reported drug use of adolescents.
    Needle RH; Jou SC; Su SS
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 1989; 15(3):275-89. PubMed ID: 2788363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.
    Mauz E; Hoffmann R; Houben R; Krause L; Kamtsiuris P; Gößwald A
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e64. PubMed ID: 29506967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-reports by alcohol and drug abuse inpatients: factors affecting reliability and validity.
    Brown J; Kranzler HR; Del Boca FK
    Br J Addict; 1992 Jul; 87(7):1013-24. PubMed ID: 1322747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of method on participants and disclosure rates in research on sensitive topics.
    Reddy MK; Fleming MT; Howells NL; Rabenhorst MM; Casselman R; Rosenbaum A
    Violence Vict; 2006 Aug; 21(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 16897916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of drug use responses in a longitudinal study.
    Pedersen W
    Scand J Psychol; 1990; 31(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 2333484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid assessment of sexual behavior, drug use, human immunodeficiency virus, and sexually transmitted diseases in northern thai youth using audio-computer-assisted self-interviewing and noninvasive specimen collection.
    van Griensven F; Supawitkul S; Kilmarx PH; Limpakarnjanarat K; Young NL; Manopaiboon C; Mock PA; Korattana S; Mastro TD
    Pediatrics; 2001 Jul; 108(1):E13. PubMed ID: 11433092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and consistency in self-reports of drug use.
    O'Malley PM; Bachman JG; Johnston LD
    Int J Addict; 1983 Aug; 18(6):805-24. PubMed ID: 6605313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires compared with a paper version in a randomized study.
    Mangunkusumo RT; Moorman PW; Van Den Berg-de Ruiter AE; Van Der Lei J; De Koning HJ; Raat H
    J Adolesc Health; 2005 Jan; 36(1):70.e1-6. PubMed ID: 15661601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An examination of self- and telephone-administered modes of administration for the Australian SF-36.
    Perkins JJ; Sanson-Fisher RW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):969-73. PubMed ID: 9817114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mode effects on self-reported alcohol use and problem drinking: mail questionnaires and personal interviewing compared.
    Bongers IM; Van Oers JA
    J Stud Alcohol; 1998 May; 59(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 9598708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and validity of adolescent self-reported drug use in a family-based study: a methodological report.
    Needle R; McCubbin H; Lorence J; Hochhauser M
    Int J Addict; 1983 Oct; 18(7):901-12. PubMed ID: 6605944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adolescent substance use assessment: concordance between tools using self-administered and interview formats.
    Stone AL; Latimer WW
    Subst Use Misuse; 2005; 40(12):1865-74. PubMed ID: 16419561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The characterization of inconsistencies in self-reports of alcohol and marijuana use in a longitudinal study of adolescents.
    Bailey SL; Flewelling RL; Rachal JV
    J Stud Alcohol; 1992 Nov; 53(6):636-47. PubMed ID: 1434637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and application of a self-report measure for assessing sensitive information disclosures across multiple modes.
    Pickard MD; Wilson D; Roster CA
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1734-1748. PubMed ID: 28842851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Web and mail surveys for studying secondary consequences associated with substance use: evidence for minimal mode effects.
    McCabe SE; Couper MP; Cranford JA; Boyd CJ
    Addict Behav; 2006 Jan; 31(1):162-8. PubMed ID: 15916862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence of youth substance use: the impact of methodological differences between two national surveys.
    Gfroerer J; Wright D; Kopstein A
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1997 Jul; 47(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 9279494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collecting substance use data with an anonymous mailed survey.
    Trinkoff AM; Storr CL
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1997 Oct; 48(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 9330915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of data collection mode and ethnicity of interviewer on response rates and self-reported alcohol use among Turks and Moroccans in the Netherlands: an experimental study.
    Dotinga A; van den Eijnden RJ; Bosveld W; Garretsen HF
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2005; 40(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 15797881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of self-report: the research record.
    Harrell AV
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1985; 57():12-21. PubMed ID: 3929109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correcting for the underreporting of drug use in opinion surveys.
    McAllister I; Makkai T
    Int J Addict; 1991 Sep; 26(9):945-61. PubMed ID: 1743823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.