184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27884175)
1. Network meta-analyses performed by contracting companies and commissioned by industry.
Schuit E; Ioannidis JP
Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):198. PubMed ID: 27884175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
Ioannidis JP
Milbank Q; 2016 Sep; 94(3):485-514. PubMed ID: 27620683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation.
Ross JS; Hill KP; Egilman DS; Krumholz HM
JAMA; 2008 Apr; 299(15):1800-12. PubMed ID: 18413874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.
Evoniuk G; Mansi B; DeCastro B; Sykes J
BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1726. PubMed ID: 28432051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
Verbitskaya EV
Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
Vavken P; Dorotka R
J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
Vaitkus PT; Brar C
Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trial results in mental health.
Dal-Ré R; Bobes J; Cuijpers P
Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 28351418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Industry sponsorship and publication bias among animal studies evaluating the effects of statins on atherosclerosis and bone outcomes: a meta-analysis.
Anglemyer AT; Krauth D; Bero L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():12. PubMed ID: 25880564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there bias in the publication of individual patient data meta-analyses?
Tierney JF; Clarke M; Stewart LA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(2):657-67. PubMed ID: 10932430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How health technology assessment agencies address the issue of unpublished data.
Kreis J; Panteli D; Busse R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Jan; 30(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 24622603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subgroup analyses of clinical effectiveness to support health technology assessments.
Paget MA; Chuang-Stein C; Fletcher C; Reid C
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(6):532-8. PubMed ID: 22140066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An assessment of the methodological quality of published network meta-analyses: a systematic review.
Chambers JD; Naci H; Wouters OJ; Pyo J; Gunjal S; Kennedy IR; Hoey MG; Winn A; Neumann PJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121715. PubMed ID: 25923737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting of conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of trials of pharmacological treatments.
Roseman M; Milette K; Bero LA; Coyne JC; Lexchin J; Turner EH; Thombs BD
JAMA; 2011 Mar; 305(10):1008-17. PubMed ID: 21386079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological quality of meta-analyses: matched-pairs comparison over time and between industry-sponsored and academic-sponsored reports.
Lane PW; Higgins JP; Anagnostelis B; Anzures-Cabrera J; Baker NF; Cappelleri JC; Haughie S; Hollis S; Lewis SC; Moneuse P; Whitehead A
Res Synth Methods; 2013 Dec; 4(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 26053947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analyses with industry involvement are massively published and report no caveats for antidepressants.
Ebrahim S; Bance S; Athale A; Malachowski C; Ioannidis JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():155-63. PubMed ID: 26399904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies.
Cook DJ; Guyatt GH; Ryan G; Clifton J; Buckingham L; Willan A; McIlroy W; Oxman AD
JAMA; 1993 Jun; 269(21):2749-53. PubMed ID: 8492400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
